User talk:0rrAvenger

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 03:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, you got me

Funny though, how on this account I have done nothing worthy of a block other than socking. Compare this sock to Davidyork's socks. The point of blocking sockpuppets is so that the user doesn't go back do doing whatever got him in trouble the first time. So, what is the point of blocking me? I'm not causing any trouble. Unless of course, telling other users to cheer up, handing out barnstars to helpful users, and whatnot is considered disruptive. But that's ok. You know what? Fuck you all. I'll keep making sockpuppets just out of spite. But I won't vandalize or troll, just to piss you off even more. Let's see who catches my next sock. This is fairly sad though.. Doesn't matt57 have better things to do than make sure people who oppose his views can't edit Wikipedia? --Kirby♥time 07:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I'm using FFI's proxy server program to create new accounts. Suck it Seena. --Kirby♥time 07:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, you tried to play innocent first, denying that you're were OrrAvenger. Yes I know you wont stop sock puppetting, you cant resist coming here (and trolling). Sock puppeting to evade a ban is against policy, no matter how "good" are you are with your new sock. Otherwise everyone who gets blocked would go around making socks so whats the use of a ban? See, your logic doesnt make sense. Kirbytime the problem is this. You have to go back and wonder why you got banned indef in the first place and that was for excessive and supreme trolling. Go back, look at all you've been saying to people on this website like wiki linking to pss christ and stuff. Was that all good behavior? It doesnt pay off. Bad people get it in the end. Gandhi said that. You're a good clone of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Maybe you cant help it. In that case, you're better off not editing here. This talk page will probably be protected soon and our comments deleted. Its going to harder to catch your next socks but its okay. The checkuser report I made was pretty funny. I wonder which sock you will make next and pretend to play with the sandbox for over an hour and to play innnocent by not knowing how to move a page. Now that was funny. Have fun. --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 11:58, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't "pretend" to do anything. I did that with the sandbox because I wanted to test Special:longpages. Also, new users can't move pages. I really love how you are spending so much time on me. It really hurts you that I'm an atheist and think you're wrong, eh?--0rrAvenger 22:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I love how User:Kirbytime says I'm an "abusive sock"

Also, that template needs to be fixed. The subsection it links to was renamed. I want to see who fixes this =).--0rrAvenger 22:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

0rrAvenger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not abusive. I created a sock puppet in good faith. Also, per WP:BLOCK, "Blocks are used in order to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, not to punish users." What damage or disruption was this account doing? Thanks.

Decline reason:

Looks to me as if this is an abusive sockpuppet. Guy (Help!) 22:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LOL. Perfect answer. Totally explains everything. Just what was expected. Thanks. This is my green light to continue sockpuppeting.--0rrAvenger 22:30, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you need to read the policy more carefully:

Circumventing policy

Policies apply per person, not per account. Policies such as 3RR are for each person's edits. Using a second account for policy violations will cause any penalties to be applied to your main account. Users who are banned or blocked from editing may not use sock puppets to circumvent this. Evading a block or ban causes the timer on the block to restart, and may further lengthen it.

This page might need to be cleaned up and protected as Kirbytime will continue to troll here as he did with his previous page. Needless to say, you cant create a sock and continue editing if you are banned. Common sense will tell you that every website which bans you also bans any other identities that you have. By the way, I was'nt the one keeping an eye out for you, there were others who alerted me of this. How sad; there was a time when you were treated respectfully here. Now you are banished from this website. --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 23:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]