Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Kash: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Arctic Night (talk | contribs) →Kimberly Kash: keep |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* |
* |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Wrestling|list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—[[User:Nikki311|<font color="Teal">'''Nikki'''</font>]]<font color="Salmon">'''♥'''</font>[[User Talk:Nikki311|<font color="Purple">'''311'''</font>]] 15:58, 29 May 2009 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Wrestling|list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—[[User:Nikki311|<font color="Teal">'''Nikki'''</font>]]<font color="Salmon">'''♥'''</font>[[User Talk:Nikki311|<font color="Purple">'''311'''</font>]] 15:58, 29 May 2009 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''' - [[WP:ATHLETE]] says that ''people who have competed at the fully professional level of a sport'' are considered notable. I did some sleuthing and found that Kash does meet this guideline; [http://ladysports.com/stories/kk.htm] contains an interview that the subject of the article has been in ''Elite Pro Wrestling, Adrenaline Rush Wrestling, NWA Indiana, Fight Sports Midwest, KOTC Charity Show'' - the NWA is the [[National Wrestling Alliance]]. According to the Wikipedia article on the NWA, ''The National Wrestling Alliance (NWA) is the largest governing body for a group of independent professional wrestling promotions and sanctions various NWA championships in the United States'' - it seems to me that this qualifies as a 'fully professional level'. So, yes, I would say that Kimberly Kash does satisfy the requirements of [[WP:ATHLETE]] and I think this should be kept. [[User:JulieSpaulding|JulieSpaulding]] ([[User talk:JulieSpaulding|talk]]) 17:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:46, 29 May 2009
- Kimberly Kash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. No notability established. Hasn't won a championship in a notable promotion. No third party sources to help indicate notability. Nikki♥311 15:57, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki♥311 15:58, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - WP:ATHLETE says that people who have competed at the fully professional level of a sport are considered notable. I did some sleuthing and found that Kash does meet this guideline; [1] contains an interview that the subject of the article has been in Elite Pro Wrestling, Adrenaline Rush Wrestling, NWA Indiana, Fight Sports Midwest, KOTC Charity Show - the NWA is the National Wrestling Alliance. According to the Wikipedia article on the NWA, The National Wrestling Alliance (NWA) is the largest governing body for a group of independent professional wrestling promotions and sanctions various NWA championships in the United States - it seems to me that this qualifies as a 'fully professional level'. So, yes, I would say that Kimberly Kash does satisfy the requirements of WP:ATHLETE and I think this should be kept. JulieSpaulding (talk) 17:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)