Jump to content

Eugenio Beltrami: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Unlinking full-dates. Details here. Codes: BRodd(×2)
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
| footnotes=
| footnotes=
}}
}}
'''Eugenio Beltrami''' (November 16, 1835, [[Cremona]] – February 18, 1900, [[Rome]]) was an [[Italy|Italian]] mathematician notable for his work in [[differential geometry]] and [[mathematical physics]]. Beltrami's work was noted for his modern approach and the clarity of exposition. He was the first to prove consistency of [[non-Euclidean geometry]] by modeling it on a surface of [[constant curvature]], the [[pseudosphere]], and in the interior of an ''n''-dimensional unit ball, the so-called [[Beltrami–Klein model]]. He also pioneered the [[singular value decomposition]] for matrices, which has been subsequently rediscovered several times. Beltrami's use of differential calculus in problems of mathematical physics indirectly influenced development of [[tensor calculus]] by [[Gregorio Ricci-Curbastro]] and [[Tullio Levi-Civita]].
'''Eugenio Beltrami''' (November 16, 1835, [[Cremona]] – February 18, 1900, [[Rome]]) was an [[Italy|Italian]] mathematician notable for his work concerning [[differential geometry]] and [[mathematical physics]]. His work was noted especially for clarity of exposition.
He was the first to prove consistency of [[non-Euclidean geometry]] by modeling it on a surface of [[constant curvature]], the [[pseudosphere]], and in the interior of an ''n''-dimensional unit sphere, the so-called [[Beltrami–Klein model]]. He also developed [[singular value decomposition]] for matrices, which has been subsequently rediscovered several times. Beltrami's use of differential calculus for problems of mathematical physics indirectly influenced development of [[tensor calculus]] by [[Gregorio Ricci-Curbastro]] and [[Tullio Levi-Civita]].


== Short biography ==
== Short biography ==


Beltrami was born in [[Cremona]] in [[Lombardy]], then a part of the [[Austrian Empire]], and now part of Italy. He began studying mathematics at [[University of Pavia]] in 1853, but was expelled
Beltrami was born in [[Cremona]] in [[Lombardy]], then a part of the [[Austrian Empire]], and now part of Italy. He began studying mathematics at [[University of Pavia]] during 1853, but was expelled
from [[Ghislieri College]] in 1856 due to his political views. During this time he was taught and influenced by [[Francesco Brioschi]].
from [[Ghislieri College]] during 1856 due to his political opinions. During this time he was taught and influenced by [[Francesco Brioschi]].
He had to discontinue his studies because of financial hardship and spent next several years as a secretary working for Lombardy–Venice railroad company. He was appointed to the [[University of Bologna]] as a professor in 1862, the year he published his first paper. Throughout his life, Beltrami held various positions at universities in [[Pisa]], [[Rome]] and Pavia. From 1891 until the end of his life Beltrami lived in Rome. He became the president of the [[Accademia dei Lincei]] in 1898 and a senator of the Kingdom of Italy in 1899.
He had to discontinue his studies because of financial hardship and spent the next several years as a secretary working for the Lombardy–Venice railroad company. He was appointed to the [[University of Bologna]] as a professor during 1862, the year he published his first research paper. Throughout his life, Beltrami had various professorial jobs at universities in [[Pisa]], [[Rome]] and Pavia. From 1891 until the end of his life Beltrami lived in Rome. He became the president of the [[Accademia dei Lincei]] during 1898 and a senator of the Kingdom of Italy during 1899.


== Contributions to non-Euclidean geometry ==
== Contributions to non-Euclidean geometry ==


In 1868 Beltrami published two memoirs (written in Italian; French translations by J. Hoüel appeared in 1869) dealing with consistency and interpretations of [[non-Euclidean geometry]] of [[Bolyai]] and [[Lobachevsky]]. <!-- Beltrami does ''not'' cite [[Bolyai]]! --> In his "Essay on an interpretation of non-Euclidean geometry", Beltrami proposed that this geometry could be realized on a surface of constant negative [[Gaussian curvature|curvature]], a [[pseudosphere]]. In Beltrami's approach, lines of the geometry are represented by [[geodesic]]s on the pseudosphere and theorems of non-Euclidean geometry can be proved within ordinary three-dimensional [[Euclidean space]], and not derived in an axiomatic fashion, as Lobachevsky and [[Bolyai]] had done previously. In 1840, [[Ferdinand Minding|Minding]] already considered geodesic triangles on the pseudosphere and remarked that the corresponding "trigonometric formulas" are obtained from the corresponding formulas of [[spherical trigonometry]] by replacing the usual [[trigonometric functions]] with [[hyperbolic function]]s; this was further developed by [[Delfino Codazzi|Codazzi]] in 1857, but apparently neither of them noticed the connection with Lobachevsky's work. In this way, Beltrami attempted to demonstrate that two-dimensional non-Euclidean geometry is as valid as the Euclidean geometry of the space, and in particular, that Euclid's [[parallel postulate]] could not be derived from the other axioms of [[Euclidean geometry]]. It is often stated that this proof was incomplete due to the singularities of the pseudosphere, which means that geodesics could not be extended indefinitely. However, John Stillwell remarks that Beltrami must have been well aware of this difficulty, which is also manifested in the fact that the pseudosphere is topologically a [[Cylinder (geometry)|cylinder]], and not a plane, and he spent a part of his memoir designing a way around it. By a suitable choice of coordinates, Beltrami showed how the [[Riemannian metric|metric]] on the pseudosphere can be transferred to the [[unit disk]] and that the [[singularity theory|singularity]] of the pseudosphere corresponds to a [[horocycle]] on the non-Euclidean plane. On the other hand, in the introduction to his memoir, Beltrami states that it would be impossible to justify "the rest of Lobachevsky's theory", i.e. the non-Euclidean geometry of space, by this method.
During 1868 Beltrami published two memoirs (written in Italian; French translations by J. Hoüel appeared during 1869) dealing with consistency and interpretations of [[non-Euclidean geometry]] of [[Bolyai]] and [[Lobachevsky]]. <!-- Beltrami does ''not'' cite [[Bolyai]]! --> In his "Essay on an interpretation of non-Euclidean geometry", Beltrami proposed that this geometry could be realized on a surface of constant negative [[Gaussian curvature|curvature]], a [[pseudosphere]]. For Beltrami's concept, lines of the geometry are represented by [[geodesic]]s on the pseudosphere and theorems of non-Euclidean geometry can be proved within ordinary three-dimensional [[Euclidean space]], and not derived in an axiomatic fashion, as [[Lobachevsky]] and [[Bolyai]] had done previously. During 1840, [[Ferdinand Minding|Minding]] already considered geodesic triangles on the pseudosphere and remarked that the corresponding "trigonometric formulas" are obtained from the corresponding formulas of [[spherical trigonometry]] by replacing the usual [[trigonometric functions]] with [[hyperbolic function]]s; this was further developed by [[Delfino Codazzi|Codazzi]] during 1857, but apparently neither of them noticed the association with Lobachevsky's work. In this way, Beltrami attempted to demonstrate that two-dimensional non-Euclidean geometry is as valid as the Euclidean geometry of the space, and in particular, that Euclid's [[parallel postulate]] could not be derived from the other axioms of [[Euclidean geometry]]. It is often stated that this proof was incomplete due to the singularities of the pseudosphere, which means that geodesics could not be extended indefinitely. However, John Stillwell remarks that Beltrami must have been well aware of this difficulty, which is also manifested by the fact that the pseudosphere is topologically a [[Cylinder (geometry)|cylinder]], and not a plane, and he spent a part of his memoir designing a way around it. By a suitable choice of coordinates, Beltrami showed how the [[Riemannian metric|metric]] on the pseudosphere can be transferred to the [[unit disk]] and that the [[singularity theory|singularity]] of the pseudosphere corresponds to a [[horocycle]] on the non-Euclidean plane. On the other hand, in the introduction to his memoir, Beltrami states that it would be impossible to justify "the rest of Lobachevsky's theory", i.e. the non-Euclidean geometry of space, by this method.


In the second memoir published in the same year (1868), "Fundamental theory of spaces of constant curvature", Beltrami went much farther and gave an abstract proof of [[equiconsistency]] of hyperbolic and Euclidean geometry in any dimension. He accomplished this by introducing several models of non-Euclidean geometry that are now known as the [[Beltrami&ndash;Klein model]], the [[Poincaré disk model]], and the [[Poincaré half-plane model]], together with transformations that relate them. For the half-plane model, Beltrami cited a note by [[Liouville]] in the treatise of [[Gaspard Monge|Monge]] on [[differential geometry]]. Beltrami also showed that ''n''-dimensional Euclidean geometry is realized on a [[horosphere]] of the (''n''&nbsp;+&nbsp;1)-dimensional [[hyperbolic space]], so the logical relation between consistency of the Euclidean and the non-Euclidean geometries is symmetric. Beltrami acknowledged the influence of [[Riemann]]'s groundbreaking ''Habilitation'' lecture "On the hypotheses on which geometry is based" (1854; published posthumously in 1868).
In the second memoir published during the same year (1868), "Fundamental theory of spaces of constant curvature", Beltrami continued this logic and gave an abstract proof of [[equiconsistency]] of hyperbolic and Euclidean geometry for any dimension. He accomplished this by introducing several models of non-Euclidean geometry that are now known as the [[Beltrami&ndash;Klein model]], the [[Poincaré disk model]], and the [[Poincaré half-plane model]], together with transformations that relate them. For the half-plane model, Beltrami cited a note by [[Liouville]] in the treatise of [[Gaspard Monge|Monge]] on [[differential geometry]]. Beltrami also showed that ''n''-dimensional Euclidean geometry is realized on a [[horosphere]] of the (''n''&nbsp;+&nbsp;1)-dimensional [[hyperbolic space]], so the logical relation between consistency of the Euclidean and the non-Euclidean geometries is symmetric. Beltrami acknowledged the influence of [[Riemann]]'s groundbreaking ''Habilitation'' lecture "On the hypotheses on which geometry is based" (1854; published posthumously during 1868).


Although today Beltrami's "Essay" is recognized as a milestone in the development of non-Euclidean geometry, the reception at the time was less enthusiastic. [[Luigi Cremona|Cremona]] objected to perceived circular reasoning, which even forced Beltrami to delay the publication of the "Essay" by one year. Subsequently, [[Felix Klein]] failed to acknowledge Beltrami's priority in construction of the projective disk model of the non-Euclidean geometry. This reaction can be attributed in part to the novelty of Beltrami's approach, which was close to the ideas of Riemann concerning abstract [[manifold]]s. J. Hoüel published Beltrami's proof in his French translation of works of Lobachevsky and Bolyai.
Although today Beltrami's "Essay" is recognized as very important for the development of non-Euclidean geometry, the reception at the time was less enthusiastic. [[Luigi Cremona|Cremona]] objected to perceived circular reasoning, which even forced Beltrami to delay the publication of the "Essay" by one year. Subsequently, [[Felix Klein]] failed to acknowledge Beltrami's priority in construction of the projective disk model of the non-Euclidean geometry. This reaction can be attributed in part to the novelty of Beltrami's reasoning, which was similar to the ideas of Riemann concerning abstract [[manifold]]s. J. Hoüel published Beltrami's proof in his French translation of works of Lobachevsky and Bolyai.


== Works ==
== Works ==

Revision as of 17:10, 17 January 2010

Eugenio Beltrami
Eugenio Beltrami
Born(1835-11-16)16 November 1835
Died18 February 1900(1900-02-18) (aged 64)
NationalityItalian
Alma materUniversity of Pavia
Known forLaplace–Beltrami operator
Scientific career
FieldsMathematician
InstitutionsUniversity of Bologna
University of Pisa
University of Rome
Doctoral advisorFrancesco Brioschi

Eugenio Beltrami (November 16, 1835, Cremona – February 18, 1900, Rome) was an Italian mathematician notable for his work concerning differential geometry and mathematical physics. His work was noted especially for clarity of exposition. He was the first to prove consistency of non-Euclidean geometry by modeling it on a surface of constant curvature, the pseudosphere, and in the interior of an n-dimensional unit sphere, the so-called Beltrami–Klein model. He also developed singular value decomposition for matrices, which has been subsequently rediscovered several times. Beltrami's use of differential calculus for problems of mathematical physics indirectly influenced development of tensor calculus by Gregorio Ricci-Curbastro and Tullio Levi-Civita.

Short biography

Beltrami was born in Cremona in Lombardy, then a part of the Austrian Empire, and now part of Italy. He began studying mathematics at University of Pavia during 1853, but was expelled from Ghislieri College during 1856 due to his political opinions. During this time he was taught and influenced by Francesco Brioschi. He had to discontinue his studies because of financial hardship and spent the next several years as a secretary working for the Lombardy–Venice railroad company. He was appointed to the University of Bologna as a professor during 1862, the year he published his first research paper. Throughout his life, Beltrami had various professorial jobs at universities in Pisa, Rome and Pavia. From 1891 until the end of his life Beltrami lived in Rome. He became the president of the Accademia dei Lincei during 1898 and a senator of the Kingdom of Italy during 1899.

Contributions to non-Euclidean geometry

During 1868 Beltrami published two memoirs (written in Italian; French translations by J. Hoüel appeared during 1869) dealing with consistency and interpretations of non-Euclidean geometry of Bolyai and Lobachevsky. In his "Essay on an interpretation of non-Euclidean geometry", Beltrami proposed that this geometry could be realized on a surface of constant negative curvature, a pseudosphere. For Beltrami's concept, lines of the geometry are represented by geodesics on the pseudosphere and theorems of non-Euclidean geometry can be proved within ordinary three-dimensional Euclidean space, and not derived in an axiomatic fashion, as Lobachevsky and Bolyai had done previously. During 1840, Minding already considered geodesic triangles on the pseudosphere and remarked that the corresponding "trigonometric formulas" are obtained from the corresponding formulas of spherical trigonometry by replacing the usual trigonometric functions with hyperbolic functions; this was further developed by Codazzi during 1857, but apparently neither of them noticed the association with Lobachevsky's work. In this way, Beltrami attempted to demonstrate that two-dimensional non-Euclidean geometry is as valid as the Euclidean geometry of the space, and in particular, that Euclid's parallel postulate could not be derived from the other axioms of Euclidean geometry. It is often stated that this proof was incomplete due to the singularities of the pseudosphere, which means that geodesics could not be extended indefinitely. However, John Stillwell remarks that Beltrami must have been well aware of this difficulty, which is also manifested by the fact that the pseudosphere is topologically a cylinder, and not a plane, and he spent a part of his memoir designing a way around it. By a suitable choice of coordinates, Beltrami showed how the metric on the pseudosphere can be transferred to the unit disk and that the singularity of the pseudosphere corresponds to a horocycle on the non-Euclidean plane. On the other hand, in the introduction to his memoir, Beltrami states that it would be impossible to justify "the rest of Lobachevsky's theory", i.e. the non-Euclidean geometry of space, by this method.

In the second memoir published during the same year (1868), "Fundamental theory of spaces of constant curvature", Beltrami continued this logic and gave an abstract proof of equiconsistency of hyperbolic and Euclidean geometry for any dimension. He accomplished this by introducing several models of non-Euclidean geometry that are now known as the Beltrami–Klein model, the Poincaré disk model, and the Poincaré half-plane model, together with transformations that relate them. For the half-plane model, Beltrami cited a note by Liouville in the treatise of Monge on differential geometry. Beltrami also showed that n-dimensional Euclidean geometry is realized on a horosphere of the (n + 1)-dimensional hyperbolic space, so the logical relation between consistency of the Euclidean and the non-Euclidean geometries is symmetric. Beltrami acknowledged the influence of Riemann's groundbreaking Habilitation lecture "On the hypotheses on which geometry is based" (1854; published posthumously during 1868).

Although today Beltrami's "Essay" is recognized as very important for the development of non-Euclidean geometry, the reception at the time was less enthusiastic. Cremona objected to perceived circular reasoning, which even forced Beltrami to delay the publication of the "Essay" by one year. Subsequently, Felix Klein failed to acknowledge Beltrami's priority in construction of the projective disk model of the non-Euclidean geometry. This reaction can be attributed in part to the novelty of Beltrami's reasoning, which was similar to the ideas of Riemann concerning abstract manifolds. J. Hoüel published Beltrami's proof in his French translation of works of Lobachevsky and Bolyai.

Works

  • Beltrami, Eugenio (1868). "Saggio di interpretazione della geometria non-euclidea". Giornale di Mathematiche. VI: 285–315.
  • Beltrami, Eugenio (1868). "Teoria fondamentale degli spazii di curvatura costante". Annali. Di Mat., ser II. 2: 232–255. doi:10.1007/BF02419615.
  • Opere matematiche di Eugenio Beltrami pubblicate per cura della Facoltà di scienze della r. Università di Roma (volumes 1–2) (U. Hoepli, Milano, 1902–1920)
  • Same edition, vols. 1–4

See also

References

  • John Stillwell, Sources of hyperbolic geometry, History of Mathematics, vol 10, American Mathematical Society and London Mathematical Society
  • Jeremy Gray, Poincaré and Klein — Groups and Geometries. In 1830–1930: a Century of Geometry (ed L.Boi, D.Flament and J.-M.Salanskis), Springer, 1992, 35–44

External links


Template:Persondata