User talk:Wildhartlivie

Welcome!

Currently retired from all
WP:CRIME related articles

Referencing

{{refstart}} or link to WP:REFB.

---

Regarding this exchange

just archived ... do you realize how rude you sound to a third party who just happens by to read the exchange? I warned you that you needed to change your approach. You are not assuming good faith of others. I'm not kidding here... change your approach and work with others instead of assuming the worst of them and attacking them. ++Lar: t/c 00:28, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I can't say who started with the rude language but Jack wasn't a complete angel about that either. One thing that irks me a little about your behavior specifically, WLH, is the way you keep on removing discussions from your talk page while continuing them on other people's talk pages. You're allowed to do it technically, but I find it kind of unhelpful, maybe almost inflammatory, even as an onlooker. Food for thought. Equazcion ^(talk) 00:51, 7 Mar 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I removed the original post he made and he restored it to continue on, I was replying to it on your page because he would not respond to my requests to explain the problems to me here by referring to what he perceived to be my inability to understand it. That he did tell you seemed the place to say that wasn't so hard to do. Please tell Lar this, since I felt quite insulted by the comments he posted to me. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

The removing of threads and splitting them to multiple pages is annoying and disruptive. Several threads here were removed, seemingly to sweep criticism under the carpet. The last was not even archived. I explained my concern with the coding to Equazcion because I am aware that he understands code (toolbar, anyone?). You quite apparently do not grok code as it is you who seems primarily responsible for encouraging that wiki-club to copypasta invalid code all over the wiki. You don't seem much interested in sorting this out by any other means than edit waring and by casting aspersions about my intent here.

I've tried to talk with you to little effect, as both Larry's and Equazcion's comments rather endorse. I don't care much about you personally, but I will not stand for crappy code being dumped into this project. I'll talk if you cut the bullshite; I'll take you to RFC/U if I have to. What's next is up to you. Regards, Jack Merridew 01:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I wouldn't say I endorsed that exactly, Jack. I don't know where the bad vibes started, but the first indicator I see is "Please get on the right path, here" from Jack, which I don't think was a good way to start, if that was indeed the first communication about this issue; but I also think WHL may have taken Jack's dismissal of her code-understanding abilities a bit too personally when they weren't necessarily intended that way. Anyway in the end it's all been worked out and you were both right about something (Jack about the code, WHL about the font size), so it would seem the matter can be put to rest. Equazcion ^(talk) 01:56, 7 Mar 2010 (UTC)

Reply about Possession and how use of Amazon as source is acceptable

Leaving this notice here now since page is currently not archived which is reason why I did not leave it here at time of posting as explained in my talk page edit summary [1]

Reply to editor here [2]

Garda40 (talk) 01:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)