Jump to content

User talk:DJFryzy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DJFryzy (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
::::Disputes are one thing, however a concerted effort to shine an article in a negative light is another. Please see the "Concerted campaign" with <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 's plea
::::Disputes are one thing, however a concerted effort to shine an article in a negative light is another. Please see the "Concerted campaign" with <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 's plea
::::I am happy to discuss and help make this article better, however just rewriting an entire article with the quotes and papers from Ernst's latest book is not a way to write an online encyclopaedia.[[User:DJFryzy|DJFryzy]] ([[User talk:DJFryzy#top|talk]]) 05:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
::::I am happy to discuss and help make this article better, however just rewriting an entire article with the quotes and papers from Ernst's latest book is not a way to write an online encyclopaedia.[[User:DJFryzy|DJFryzy]] ([[User talk:DJFryzy#top|talk]]) 05:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

== Discretionary sanctions notification ==

{{Ivmbox
| The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to [[pseudoscience]] and [[fringe science]]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], satisfy any [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standard of behavior]], or follow any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience#Final decision|Final decision]]" section of the decision page.<p>

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]], with the appropriate sections of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures]], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and&nbsp;will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 07:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
| Ambox warning blue.svg
| icon size = 40px
}}<!-- This message is derived from Template:Uw-sanctions -->

Revision as of 07:20, 12 February 2014


A word of advice

Read WP:VANDAL. The community tends to take a dim view of repeated accusations of 'vandalism' [1][2] when it is clear that nothing of the sort is occurring. AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you actually reading the same article? Surely you can see QuackGuru's history of repeated warnings and destructive editing going back to 2007 on a variety of pages DJFryzy (talk) 05:00, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Content disputes are not vandalism. AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:22, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disputes are one thing, however a concerted effort to shine an article in a negative light is another. Please see the "Concerted campaign" with Guy (Help!) 's plea
I am happy to discuss and help make this article better, however just rewriting an entire article with the quotes and papers from Ernst's latest book is not a way to write an online encyclopaedia.DJFryzy (talk) 05:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to pseudoscience and fringe science. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]