Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 243732508 by Xenocidic (talk)fix again, something went wrong
m a botching of an epic nature
Line 1: Line 1:
===Rollback <small>([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback&action=edit&section=T-1 add request])</small>===
===Rollback <small>([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback&action=edit&section=T-1 add request])</small>===
<!-- PLEASE remember to use {{subst:rfp|Nissanaltima|It would be a useful tool in fighting vandalism.}} to request Rollback. Among other things, this gives us the link to grant access. Also, please post your request BELOW this note. Thanks.-->
<!-- PLEASE remember to use {{subst:rfp|Nissanaltima|It would be a useful tool in fighting vandalism.}} to request Rollback. Among other things, this gives us the link to grant access. Also, please post your request BELOW this note. Thanks.-->



====[[User:Megaman en m]]====
====[[User:Megaman en m]]====
*{{Usercheck-short|Megaman en m}} ([[Special:Userrights/Megaman en m|<span style="color:#002bb8">'''assign permissions'''</span>]])
*{{Usercheck-short|Megaman en m}} ([[Special:Userrights/Megaman en m|<span style="color:#002bb8">'''assign permissions'''</span>]])
Yes I know I requested this earlier. The person who reviewed my request said that "I had too many concerning edits" or something in those lines. Then I replied explaining why I made all those edits (They were not vandalism). But it just got deleted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback&diff=next&oldid=243447444]. So basically my request got denied for absolutely no reason so I'm requesting this again. I know that it should be ONLY used in case of vandalism.--[[User:Megaman en m|Megaman en m]] ([[User talk:Megaman en m|talk]]) 15:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
:{{lorem}} --[[User:Megaman en m|Megaman en m]] ([[User talk:Megaman en m|talk]]) 15:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
**{{not done}} This was, as you say, denied yesterday. The diffs presented were you undoing edits that were not obviously vandalism - in that sense they are troubling edits indicating that you are not ready for the rollback tool. Try again in a few weeks or so. [[User:Fritzpoll|Fritzpoll]] ([[User talk:Fritzpoll|talk]]) 15:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
**{{not done}} This was, as you say, denied yesterday. The diffs presented were you undoing edits that were not obviously vandalism - in that sense they are troubling edits indicating that you are not ready for the rollback tool. Try again in a few weeks or so. [[User:Fritzpoll|Fritzpoll]] ([[User talk:Fritzpoll|talk]]) 15:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
*
*

Revision as of 20:39, 7 October 2008

Rollback (add request)

User:Megaman en m

Yes I know I requested this earlier. The person who reviewed my request said that "I had too many concerning edits" or something in those lines. Then I replied explaining why I made all those edits (They were not vandalism). But it just got deleted [1]. So basically my request got denied for absolutely no reason so I'm requesting this again. I know that it should be ONLY used in case of vandalism.--Megaman en m (talk) 15:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    •  Not done This was, as you say, denied yesterday. The diffs presented were you undoing edits that were not obviously vandalism - in that sense they are troubling edits indicating that you are not ready for the rollback tool. Try again in a few weeks or so. Fritzpoll (talk) 15:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Baby G.

There has been some vandalism lately on the Jazmine Sullivan article. I have been undoing it a lot. However, I read that Rollback can revert quicker than a simple undo, and can revert more than one edit at once. Therefore, I think Rollback would be useful to me. If my request is denied, I'll be able to understand completely, but I'd really appreciate if I could get Rollback privileges. --Baby G. (talk to me) (see my edits) 20:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I'm sorry, but with just 22 edits I don't have enough to go on. Suggest use of WP:UNDO for the while. Again, apologies but we do need to see some experience before granting a relatively powerful tool that can cause upset if used incorrectly. Not a personal comment just that we need a bit more "evidence" as it were. Pedro :  Chat  20:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]