User talk:DreamGuy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:23, 27 August 2008

I periodically go through and clean out the old comments... This is because they refer to old situations or that the discussions are otherwise no longer current. Those looking for archives are invited to refer to the history.

If you have a demonstrated history of personal harassment on these pages, your posts are not welcome here. (This includes certain admins who seem more interested in breaking policies than enforcing them.) You should know who you are. If you do post, your comments will be removed, most likely unread. If there's any chance that you might not know that your behavior is considered harassment, I will tell you, and from that point on you will not be allowed to post here. To anyone who doesn't know what I am referring to here, this warning does not apply to you, so by all means leave a message.

Please add new comments below (you can use the handy dandy "new section" tab next to "edit this page" at the top of the screen).

Meiling Melançon

Hi DreamGuy - Just FYI: I saw your request for editor input on the external links talk page and responded at the article. -- SiobhanHansa 00:42, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking a look. DreamGuy (talk) 17:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DeGuignes_Pekin_livres.jpg

Aha -- thanks for your brief message. On the basis of your explanation, I now appreciate that my reasoning was mistaken in uploading this specific image. I don't know how to delete an image, but the bottom line is that your thoughtful attention to detail is at least appreciated in this case.

I am sorry to learn that I was wrong, of course: but there you have it. --Tenmei (talk) 18:45, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May I trouble you further by asking how I go about deleting this wrongly uploaded image? --Tenmei (talk) 18:55, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice

Very nice[1]. I didn't like mine, but hoped it would get someone thinking, and I much appreciate your far better wording. KillerChihuahua^?!? 21:12, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

meat puppetry accusation

Per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DreamGuy 2, you are not to make uncivil comments or accusations of bad faith. However at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Tag team you have done that in the actual comment and the edit summary.[2] Using language such as "known meatpuppet" is both uncivil, and terrible bad faith, unless you have already discussed this and "known" refers to a community approved deduction. Is there any such communal discussion? If not, please initiate some kind of actual discussion where others will likely tell you that your suspicions are ill-founded. Otherwise, please stop with this kind of harassment, and go and retract your comment at the MFD and apologise to both parties. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 03:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As well, do not ever refactor my posts again. If you do so again, you will be reported to AE. Learn from your past mistakes, as I will not have the slightest hesitation to request your blocking. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 03:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 03:07, 27 August 2008 edit John Vandenberg (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 68,446 edits →‎meat puppetry accusation: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:23, 27 August 2008 edit undo Arcayne (talk \| contribs) Rollbackers 26,574 edits →‎meat puppetry accusation: you are on a precipice. Take another step at your peril Next edit →
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Per [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DreamGuy 2]], you are not to make uncivil comments or accusations of bad faith. However at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Tag team]] you have done that in the actual comment and the edit summary.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Tag_team&diff=prev&oldid=234439799] Using language such as "known meatpuppet" is both uncivil, and terrible bad faith, unless you have already discussed this and "known" refers to a community approved deduction. Is there any such communal discussion? If not, please initiate some kind of actual discussion where others will likely tell you that your suspicions are ill-founded. Otherwise, please stop with this kind of harassment, and go and retract your comment at the MFD and apologise to both parties. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Jayvdb\|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:Jayvdb\|chat]])'''</sup></span> 03:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)		Per [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DreamGuy 2]], you are not to make uncivil comments or accusations of bad faith. However at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Tag team]] you have done that in the actual comment and the edit summary.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Tag_team&diff=prev&oldid=234439799] Using language such as "known meatpuppet" is both uncivil, and terrible bad faith, unless you have already discussed this and "known" refers to a community approved deduction. Is there any such communal discussion? If not, please initiate some kind of actual discussion where others will likely tell you that your suspicions are ill-founded. Otherwise, please stop with this kind of harassment, and go and retract your comment at the MFD and apologise to both parties. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Jayvdb\|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:Jayvdb\|chat]])'''</sup></span> 03:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

			:As well, do not ''ever'' refactor my posts again. If you do so again, you will be reported to AE. Learn from your past mistakes, as I will not have the slightest hesitation to request your blocking. - [[User:Arcayne\|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne\|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 03:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)