User talk:Bigplankton: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:07, 26 February 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Bigplankton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dr Debug (Talk) 02:00, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not describe a legitimate dispute over content as vandalism. See Wikipedia:Civility. There is no need for this dispute to be adversarial. Gamaliel 01:49, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have entirely missed the point of my message. A disagreement over which section to place material in is a content dispute. It is not "vandalism" and it is quite rude of you to describe it as such. Please read our rules such as Wikipedia:Civility. Editing Wikipedia articles is a collaborative process, not an adversarial one, and there is no reason for you to make such a simple dispute into an adversarial conflict. Gamaliel 02:18, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abusive Admin

Heh Big, you should know that the above-user is also an admin, and frequently uses/abuses its admin powers to prevail in edit wars. Expect the next move to be stalking editing of your edits, deleting all of your changes, placing you on its "watch" page, and generally harassing you until it gets its way or moves on to another victim. Its hypocritcal use of Wikipedia rules is famous here, but rest assured that it is in fact violating Wikipedia when it makes its attack run, and eventually will be stripped of its admin powers once the rest of the admin community wakes up. I will be watching your interactions with this abuser, and will support you in your disputes with it, for which I will be punished. Morton devonshire 05:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 I see you have entirely missed the point of my message.  A disagreement over which section to place material in is a content dispute.  It is not "vandalism" and it is quite rude of you to describe it as such.  Please read our rules such as [[Wikipedia:Civility]].  Editing Wikipedia articles is a collaborative process, not an adversarial one, and there is no reason for you to make such a simple dispute into an adversarial conflict. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 02:18, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
+==Abusive Admin==
+Heh Big, you should know that the above-user is also an admin, and frequently uses/abuses its admin powers to prevail in edit wars.  Expect the next move to be stalking editing of your edits, deleting all of your changes, placing you on its "watch" page, and generally harassing you until it gets its way or moves on to another victim.  Its hypocritcal use of Wikipedia rules is famous here, but rest assured that it is in fact violating Wikipedia when it makes its attack run, and eventually will be stripped of its admin powers once the rest of the admin community wakes up.  I will be watching your interactions with this abuser, and will support you in your disputes with it, for which I will be punished.  [[User:Morton devonshire|Morton devonshire]] 05:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)