Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 July 14: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Javert2113 (talk | contribs) Comment |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:'''Keep,''' a historical image. This is similar to [[Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima]] and [[Raising the Flag at Ground Zero]]. [[User:LuxembourgLover|LuxembourgLover]] ([[User talk:LuxembourgLover|talk]]) 00:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
:'''Keep,''' a historical image. This is similar to [[Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima]] and [[Raising the Flag at Ground Zero]]. [[User:LuxembourgLover|LuxembourgLover]] ([[User talk:LuxembourgLover|talk]]) 00:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
::{{replyto|LuxembourgLover}} There's a fundamental difference in the situations. Those "raising the flag" pages are ''about'' the photographs in question, so the photographs are necessary to better understand the article. There is no page about "Evan Vucci's photograph of Donald Trump". [[User:Di (they-them)|Di (they-them)]] ([[User talk:Di (they-them)|talk]]) 00:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
::{{replyto|LuxembourgLover}} There's a fundamental difference in the situations. Those "raising the flag" pages are ''about'' the photographs in question, so the photographs are necessary to better understand the article. There is no page about "Evan Vucci's photograph of Donald Trump". [[User:Di (they-them)|Di (they-them)]] ([[User talk:Di (they-them)|talk]]) 00:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
::This is a wholly fanciful argument that does not jibe with [[WP:NFCC]]. It is beyond laughable to think you can declare something "historical" mere hours after the fact. [[User:Zaathras|Zaathras]] ([[User talk:Zaathras|talk]]) 00:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Keep''' per [[User:LuxembourgLover|LuxembourgLover]] ([[User talk:Not0nshoree|Discuss]] [[User:Not0nshoree|'''''0nshore's''''']] [[Special:contributions/Not0nshoree|contributions!!!]]) 00:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
:'''Keep''' per [[User:LuxembourgLover|LuxembourgLover]] ([[User talk:Not0nshoree|Discuss]] [[User:Not0nshoree|'''''0nshore's''''']] [[Special:contributions/Not0nshoree|contributions!!!]]) 00:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
:'''Keep.''' Well-justified in its description (no low-resolution free-use images of this event exist) and the image captures the unparalleled significance of the moment very fittingly for the article. The image from the [[murder of Lee Harvey Oswald]] comes to mind as a good analogy -- alternatives may exist, but the historic angle and context of that one image is undeniable. [[User:HandIsNotNookls|HandIsNotNookls]] ([[User talk:HandIsNotNookls|talk]]) |
:'''Keep.''' Well-justified in its description (no low-resolution free-use images of this event exist) and the image captures the unparalleled significance of the moment very fittingly for the article. The image from the [[murder of Lee Harvey Oswald]] comes to mind as a good analogy -- alternatives may exist, but the historic angle and context of that one image is undeniable. [[User:HandIsNotNookls|HandIsNotNookls]] ([[User talk:HandIsNotNookls|talk]]) |
||
Revision as of 00:45, 14 July 2024
July 14
- File:Shooting of Donald Trump.webp (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bremps (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
 | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}. |
Unfortunately I don't think that this file can be justified as fair use. The photo is not strictly necessary to understand the subject of the article, and the photo itself is never discussed in the article. If the article were about the photograph itself it would be justifiable, but this is not the case. Di (they-them) (talk) 00:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
-20240714003200-File:Shooting_of_Donald_Trump.webp){kind=link}
- Keep the image very clearly articulates information clear than any word can. It also adequately summarizes the events of the shooting, with the bloody trump being whisked away. The subject of the image, the assassination attempt against trump, is the entire subject of the article. Scu ba (talk) 00:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- {{Non-free historic image}} usually requires sourced commentary on the image itself, not what it illustrates. —Cryptic 00:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Showing Evan Vucci's copyrighted image in a cropped and low-resolution format does not satisfy WP:NFCC#2 because the original image's market role is replaced by any unlicensed edit that still retains the photographer's unique capture of Trump's bloodied face in front of the US flag. BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 00:38, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, a historical image. This is similar to Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima and Raising the Flag at Ground Zero. LuxembourgLover (talk) 00:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LuxembourgLover: There's a fundamental difference in the situations. Those "raising the flag" pages are about the photographs in question, so the photographs are necessary to better understand the article. There is no page about "Evan Vucci's photograph of Donald Trump". Di (they-them) (talk) 00:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is a wholly fanciful argument that does not jibe with WP:NFCC. It is beyond laughable to think you can declare something "historical" mere hours after the fact. Zaathras (talk) 00:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per LuxembourgLover (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 00:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Well-justified in its description (no low-resolution free-use images of this event exist) and the image captures the unparalleled significance of the moment very fittingly for the article. The image from the murder of Lee Harvey Oswald comes to mind as a good analogy -- alternatives may exist, but the historic angle and context of that one image is undeniable. HandIsNotNookls (talk)
- HandIsNotNookls: (That image is actually in the public domain for failure to renew, but I agree with your general point.) TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 00:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. This image is more historically important than many of the other images I see listed with "Non-free historic image". In addition, the spontaneous reaction was not staged, so the photographer has very little copyright interest in the photograph. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 00:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, the image seems to have potential for commercial use & can easily be replaced by a CC image (once one is taken/found). The photograph may be historically relevant, but fair use on Wikipedia seems to be a bit of a stretch. Jan-Janko (talk) 00:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. This is the most notable image and is shown throughout the media (or different variations of Trump raising his fist) so it is most informative to readers and the most relevant image to display in the infobox. Bill Williams 00:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Being notable and relevant is not the same as being justified under NFCC. Di (they-them) (talk) 00:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete One does not need to see an image like this (that is now being used to show "he's a tough guy" on social media) to understand the subject matter. Non-free media of various kinds can be used instead, or something may be released down the road Zaathras (talk) 00:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: It's an amazing photograph, artistically speaking (and kudos to the photographer), but it's still Evan Vucci's copyrighted image. As such, unless we can get a better, non-copyrighted image, I don't think we can keep it, per BluePenguin18 and Di. Better to not have a photograph. — Javert2113 (Siarad.|¤) 00:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)