User talk:Nableezy

WP:STALK

Keep it up and I'll report you stalking my edits at ANI. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 23:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

loll, you think I am stalking you to articles I have been editing for over a decade? Good luck with that one. nableezy - 23:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 23:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

You're now up to 8 pages that you've suddenly appeared at purely to revert my edits, and 90% of your edits in the last few days consist of reverting me at various pages in the PIA area. Want to keep going to 10, 15 or 20 before I have to bring it up again at ANI, or are you just that confident that admins will circle the wagons and deny anything's going on? Wikieditor19920 (talk) 01:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

It is blatantly obvious what you are doing, and I literally do not care, except for the fact that you perform WP:BLINDREVERTs at each page, accuse me of POV, and scream that my counter points are the dumbest thing you ever heard in almost every single instance. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 01:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Genius, you are going through a series of core articles on a topic area I have been editing for years and making substantial changes to the lead of those articles. And in each of those articles I have been editing that article for years and years before you ever joined this site. There is nothing sudden about it. I see the changes in my watchlist and revert them when I do. I am not obliged to watch you turn article after article to shit just because Ive already reverted you previously. When I see shit edits to articles in my watchlist I revert them. You do not get to demand that your changes stick, and you if you want to make the truly idiotic claim that I am following you to articles I was at years before you made this account then yes I am confident that any admin will see that as the idiotic claim that it is. These articles are in my watchlist. Pretty much every article in the Arab-Israeli topic area is in my watchlist. I see when you make a shitty edit. And I see when you make ones I dont mind. Those I dont revert. The shitty ones, the POV ones, yes those I revert. And will continue to do so without giving who made the edit a single thought. Maybe stop making wholesale changes to the leads of a bunch of articles at once? nableezy - 03:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC) 03:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your tireless work on Palestine-Israel articles. Thank you so much! Snuish (talk) 04:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Arab states–Israeli alliance against Iran article

On reflection, I think you are right, there is little point in pressing the case so I have removed the RFC tag and will not involve myself further there.Selfstudier (talk) 11:41, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

probably the move. nableezy - 13:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Starting 2 new discussions on the talk page right after you used an ANI to basically silence an editor with opposing views gives the appearance that you are trying to silence dissent in order to avoid having a robust discussion. I strongly recommend that you drop the ANI against @Wikieditor19920 (I happen to think that the ANI was petty and vindictive anyway) and invite him/her to respectfully participate in this discussion. If you insist on pursuing the ANI, then I think you really should avoid behavior that suggests possible impropriety--Steamboat2020 (talk) 21:32, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Im sorry what? I started two sections because it is two topics to discuss. Nobody is restricted from replying to those sections. You are certainly free to do so. This is not supposed to be a player vs player situation, you can actually answer the questions asked on the talk page and discuss the article as I am trying to do. nableezy - 21:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Oh come on! You know very well that @Wikieditor19920 has to walk on eggshells and will be afraid to comment further on that page with an active ANI against him/her.--Steamboat2020 (talk) 21:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

I really dont see how that is relevant. Or true for that matter. Personal attacks arent a necessary response to an editor (me) asking for sourcing. I really dont see why you are here instead of responding at the talk page if you think I am incorrect. nableezy - 21:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

"personal attacks"????? I said your actions give the appearance of trying to silence dissent and recommended that you really should avoid behavior that suggests possible impropriety. What part of that was a personal attack? I think I deserve an apology--Steamboat2020 (talk) 21:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

I did not mean you. I was referring to the idea that WE would have to walk on eggshells. I brought WE to ANI over personalizing disputes and making attacks. That is the only concern I had. He is certainly free to respond sans attacks. nableezy - 22:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Also, can you please read WP:INDENT? You just add one : each level, not multiple ones. nableezy - 22:04, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

A video for you

Hi, Nableezy. Here is a video for you on the Jews of Yemen (in Arabic), filmed by a Soviet film crew in 1929, under the directorship of Vladimir A. Shneyderova and operator Ilya Moiseevich Tolchan. Would that Jews and Arabs in all places can get along, to make our world a better place.Davidbena (talk) 05:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

I mean I still like you David, so thats a start right? nableezy - 05:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Of course it is. Hoping, though, that this mutual feeling will spread throughout Wikipedia.Davidbena (talk) 05:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Idk David, not feeling the love emanating from this place rn but one can hope. Spring is coming after all. nableezy - 05:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Yeah. I feel the same way. Wikipedians can improve themselves, I mean, to show more common respect and decency, and to debate our differences with civility. We can ALL learn from one another. The Arab language and culture have, believe it or not, helped us in Israel to preserve our own Jewish heritage and culture. Even the Hebrew language and the meanings of Old Hebrew words could not have been fully understood without the Arabic. You see, a great loss came upon the Jewish people because of their long and frequent exiles. Realizing this, I would think, is the first step for Jews to bridge the gap between our two peoples.Davidbena (talk) 06:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

David, as ever, I think you are a kind and decent human and I hope you and your family are well and staying safe inshaallah. nableezy - 06:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Logged warning (escalated)

Hi. I have logged a warning against you to tone down on the aggression and derision. Please note that if you prove unwilling or unable to to significantly moderate your conduct in this regard, ARBPIA sanctions are likely to be imminent. El_C 14:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)