User talk:Ktrimi991: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:32, 29 July 2021

Please click here to add a new message!

Ktrimi will return on August 5. He is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

IP

Can you make a request to ANI on the issue of IPs. This thing is becoming so persistent that I am starting to think that someone has created a BOT to do thi. LoL. Anyway I gave my opinion here. Thanks in advance. Bes-ARTTalk 10:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I will. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:13, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox film on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Maybe you should count again. I only have two recent reverts. Anyway, I've opened a thread on the tp. It would be wise to reply there, and not revert again. Khirurg (talk) 16:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] you rv Maleschreiber
[2] you rv me
[3] you rv me

It would be wise if you counted again. Bye, Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It would be even wiser if you looked at the dates. Bye. Khirurg (talk) 17:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your first rv was yesterday. If it is not "recent", feel free to make a fourth revert and try your luck at the 3RR noticeboard. Also, do not accuse me of "stalking". I have a happy life and I do not need to waste time following around other people. I hope you do not imagine yourself to be more important or interesting than you actually are. Bye, Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 29 was not "yesterday". And unlike you, I prefer to resolve disputes through discussion, not brute-force edit-warring tactics. People that lead "happy lives" don't feel the need to proclaim it loudly over and over again [4]. Khirurg (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to discuss here with you any further. You are having problems understanding what you read: [5] it says May 30 but you read it as saying "May 29"!!! Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with the concept of a time zone? Khirurg (talk) 17:38, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where do Wikipedia's guidelines say that May 30 becomes May 29 for Khirurg due to your "concept of a time zone"? After you think and reflect, you will come to understand that you mistook May 30 for May 29. No worries, things that happen. Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, 14 years on wikipedia, first time I come across someone who does not understand what a time zone is. Anyway, I think we're done here. I'll let you get on with your happy life. Khirurg (talk) 17:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you make another rv there, you will learn the concept of a time zone very well at the 3RR noticeboard. No worries again, my life is happy but sometimes I need to learn new things. Here I am learning your "concept of a time zone". Thank you for showing to me such stuff :) New ideas never bring any harm. Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I know very well how to deal with you and your edit-warring clan. Khirurg (talk) 18:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You think I am able to form a "clan", like the old ones in northern Albania or similar? Amazing, Khirurg. Honestly, really amazing. Ktrimi991 (talk) 18:14, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Second Cold War on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Largest cities on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Justice for Uncompensated Survivors Today (JUST) Act of 2017 on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Greater Germanic Reich on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2019–2020 Hong Kong protests on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mini-Schengen area

Hi can you check the wiki page about Mini-Schengen area since it's getting out of control. A user named Alex Mili is trying to POV push by calling Kosovo an "unformed" state and I'm rv his edits while I give more than enough explanations. I also made a whole essay to another editor (you can find it to my edit page) explaining why it should stay to "4 countries" and not "3+1 "unformed state". I ask you since you are contributing to Kosovo Wiki pages and you have similar experience this editor. Sorry to bother you but I don't see anyone more capable than you for this situation. Thanks

To the IP editor who posted above: the issue is now solved. And that editor is now indefinitely blocked. Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2021 Cuban protests on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sth?

Hi, Ktrimi991. I saw your comments at El C's talk page and noticed that you used "sth" several times. I have to ask, what does "sth" stand for? I've never encountered it before and had no look searching on it. Schazjmd (talk) 19:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Schazjmd: "sth" is "something" :) Ktrimi991 (talk) 19:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! My curiousity was bugging me.

Schazjmd (talk) 19:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also learn new words around while editing on Wikipedia. I am not native speaker of English, and my skills have improved a lot since when I started to edit back in 2016 (as much as when I look back I wonder why I was so dumb at the time :P ) Cheers, Ktrimi991 (talk) 19:26, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your Comment on the talk Page of EdJohnston

Miredita Trim,

I couldnt comment on your last comment on the Talk Page of User:EdJohnston, because I was blocked by him with questionable charges.

Either way, I want to give a comment on you last comment on his Talk Page.

let me Copy and Paste your Text:

"On Kosovo Serbs, contrary to their claims, both InNeed95 and User:Pipsally were making changes without consensus. The coronavirus stuff in North Kosovo has been there for a long time (InNeed95 removed it), and the consensus figure was 7%, not the 4% to which Pipsally reverted to. I made a change in another article [8] to solve a dispute between the two editors. I suggest both of you continue your discussion on the article's talk page. InNeed95, can you focus on discussing your reasons on the article talk page instead of accusing people here?"

Its a bit funny but nevermind that. I told you, that you seem to Misunderstand the actual Problem, and that you should review the situation again(Seems like you didnt).

It had nothing to do with the Procentages. I dont know from where you got this information from (probably from EdJohnston, because he just threw that reason in.... lol).

But let me just clear one thing about those "Procentage" change.

On the Article Kosovo Serbs a IP-User, changed the Article twice. The first time, his edit was reverted by another User. The second time, it was reverted by me. That IP-User changed the Procentage Number from 7% to 4%. With that, he claimed to have a source. I look the source up, and saw that it was unreliable, due to having two different claims and being old (from 2005). I contacted the IP-User thru his Talk-Page (see here: [1]) and told him about the Problem, so he does not Edit the Article again, and start a Edit-Warring.

He answered me thru my Talk-Page later on (see here: [2]) and accepted his mistake. As such, the current shown procentage of 4% is wrong and unsourced.

Either way, that was not the Problem I had with the distrubtive Editor Pipsally. Pipsally reverted several edits on the Article with the reason of "Edit-Warring". I messaged Pipsally thru his Talk-Page, and which User/Edit had the possibility to be a risk for "Edit-Warring". He did not answer my specific and clear question. After a while, I decided to go to the Articles Talk-Page and told Pipsally to explain his changes there. So we can have a consensus. He did not want to cooperate after several times I asked him to do so. As such, I requested a Protection of the side (see here:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase&oldid=1035735868) and reverted his last edit of the Article. He on the other hand, accused me of made up wrong doings and a certain Admin, that did NOT investigate the Probelm at all, accepted his request and handle the situation one sided. (Quiet a shame...)

So tell me now, who was the one doing the wrong thing? Somebody, that edited/reverted a Article with no explainations / made up explainations, or me, that asked the distrubtive User to explain his edits?

Now to your claim about the Article Deni Avdija. You did not solve the Dispute me and Pipsally had on that Article. Actually, I started a Talk-Page discussion, which ended with, non Removal of the sentence.

Btw, the Problem was not the Link you changed (which I am very in favor of, so thanks for changing that), but because of the whole sentence, which seemed to be controversial in many aspects.

Think about what I wrote. I hope you understand now, what the problem was and who the Wrong Doing User is.

Tungatjeta,

--InNeed95 (talk) 19:32, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]