User talk:DHeyward: Difference between revisions
Your interest in a drawing of an ejaculating penis? |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:Evidence in the case should not be refactored by other parties. Having said that, there is ''no value'' to posting material about real-world figures (non-Wikipedians) that even arguably skirts any possible BLP issues on an arbitration page. This case is contentious enough without that sort of thing. I recognize the level of feelings this dispute has raised on all sides but I urge that moderation prevail everywhere and especially on arbitration pages. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 21:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC) |
:Evidence in the case should not be refactored by other parties. Having said that, there is ''no value'' to posting material about real-world figures (non-Wikipedians) that even arguably skirts any possible BLP issues on an arbitration page. This case is contentious enough without that sort of thing. I recognize the level of feelings this dispute has raised on all sides but I urge that moderation prevail everywhere and especially on arbitration pages. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 21:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Your interest in a drawing of an ejaculating penis? == |
|||
I see that you are interested in my drawing of an ejaculating penis. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_talk:Ejacxto.jpg link] It's really not a very good drawing - but you are welcome to it! What do you want to do with it? Maybe you'd prefer this pic! [http://www.davidclement.com/dc-graphics/JeffGannon.jpg Jeff Gannon] (I decided to link to non explicit version out of courtesy!) - [[User:Fairness And Accuracy For All|FAAFA]] 07:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:24, 16 February 2007
- /Archive1 Created May 1. 2006
- /Archive2 Created August 24, 2006
- /Archive3 Created September 30, 2006
- /Archive4 Created November 19, 2006
- [[1]] Created 05:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Please add comments to the bottom.
Joe Scarborough
Sorry if I stepped into one helluva beesnest when I reverted there. I only thought there was one conversation on the consensus, not three. Yipe! I will let you handle that one, cause that is way out of my league and not even my department. Just trying to help out there. Slighty related sidenote....anyway a better picture of Scarborough could be found, like the one from MSNBC? The one that is up looks like it is 10 years old. - SVRTVDude (Yell - Toil) 06:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 20:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Do not refactor me again
(removed edit by unwelcome editor)
- Evidence in the case should not be refactored by other parties. Having said that, there is no value to posting material about real-world figures (non-Wikipedians) that even arguably skirts any possible BLP issues on an arbitration page. This case is contentious enough without that sort of thing. I recognize the level of feelings this dispute has raised on all sides but I urge that moderation prevail everywhere and especially on arbitration pages. Newyorkbrad 21:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Your interest in a drawing of an ejaculating penis?
I see that you are interested in my drawing of an ejaculating penis. link It's really not a very good drawing - but you are welcome to it! What do you want to do with it? Maybe you'd prefer this pic! Jeff Gannon (I decided to link to non explicit version out of courtesy!) - FAAFA 07:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
