Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federal Commonwealth Society: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Keep |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:''This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''.'' </div> |
:''This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''.'' </div> |
||
*''Keep'' Looks like a person with an agenda re-nominated this page, possibly incorrectly, as I can find only what appears to be an old discussion page on the AfD pages. [[User:Bo|Bo]] 16:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC) |
*''Keep'' Looks like a person with an agenda re-nominated this page, possibly incorrectly, as I can find only what appears to be an old discussion page on the AfD pages. [[User:Bo|Bo]] 16:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - It has been nominated for deletion by [[User:RepublicUK]]. Why? you might ask, because they disagree with this organisation! A clear breach of Point of View. Notable organisation, nominated out of spite.--[[User:Couter-revolutionary|Couter-revolutionary]] 09:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:24, 21 February 2007
- Keep Looks like a person with an agenda re-nominated this page, possibly incorrectly, as I can find only what appears to be an old discussion page on the AfD pages. Bo 16:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - It has been nominated for deletion by User:RepublicUK. Why? you might ask, because they disagree with this organisation! A clear breach of Point of View. Notable organisation, nominated out of spite.--Couter-revolutionary 09:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)