User talk:Davenbelle: Difference between revisions
Davenbelle (talk | contribs) Mr. Coolcat, isn't |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:I will be undoing the archive then; you should not be attempting to seize control of the talk page in the face of opposition. Please stop. Your archiving amounts to an attempt to sweep things under the rug. — [[User:Davenbelle|Davenbelle]] 22:12, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC) |
:I will be undoing the archive then; you should not be attempting to seize control of the talk page in the face of opposition. Please stop. Your archiving amounts to an attempt to sweep things under the rug. — [[User:Davenbelle|Davenbelle]] 22:12, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC) |
||
== My edits == |
|||
I'd like to know why are you constantly reverting my edits instead of editing them. Please provide an answer in my talk page. Thanks. --[[User:Coolcat|Cool Cat]] [[User talk:Coolcat|<sup>My Talk</sup>]] 00:52, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:52, 2 April 2005
- Your insistance on removing me from wikipedia instead of discussing is ... intresting ... good luck with that. --Cool Cat My Talk 00:57, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- To discuss with someone, it requires that the other party is really honest in the discussion. Wikipedia has no place for trolls. Continue like this, and it will become clearer for other members. It is amazing that you yourself had no problem reporting me to countless numbers of members... I guess you just got traped in your own games. Fadix 01:05, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Smells like... Socks
Did you notice the 'new' user 'Cezveci' at the Armenian Genocide article? He has made 9 edits: [1], all in the Armenian Genocide article. His POV and spelling errors are suspiciously similar to Coolcat's. Do you think that we should demand an investigation, and get this possible sock puppet closed down? Stereotek 09:11, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, I saw that. I dropped an addendum to my earlier note to Tim Starling. The developers may only respond to ArbCom requests; I very much doubt that they'll respond publicly. But not to worry, the more attention this gets, the poorer our Mr. Coolcat will fare. — Davenbelle 09:33, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
- I am pretty sure it is Coolcat. He stoped answering me, after he got trapped in my "Oghlum Ghonushma" reverted psychology and exposed himself to be a Turk propagating national biases in every articles regarding Turkey. Fadix 16:09, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Another thing I would like to add, just yesterday, Mr. Coolcat has claimed that he had access to many proxies, and that technology was his strong side, and that he could have multiple alias without being exposed if he wanted to. If he is using other IP address or proxies, there is no way to track himl, unless using his expressions, claims and common mistakes proper to him. In the past I have exposed Torque with the same methods. Fadix 16:16, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Mr. Coolcat me not
Please do not refer me as Mr, Thanks --Cool Cat My Talk 21:59, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Sock check is a very simple and routine porcess in wikipedia, if you are not a sock, you have nothing to worry. --Cool Cat My Talk 21:59, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I am re archiving talk,
YOu archive once a page exeeds a certain number of kilo bytes, even after the aercive its 32 kilobytes. --Cool Cat My Talk 22:07, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I will be undoing the archive then; you should not be attempting to seize control of the talk page in the face of opposition. Please stop. Your archiving amounts to an attempt to sweep things under the rug. — Davenbelle 22:12, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
My edits
I'd like to know why are you constantly reverting my edits instead of editing them. Please provide an answer in my talk page. Thanks. --Cool Cat My Talk 00:52, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)