User talk:Doright

Welcome! Start a new topic or scroll down to append your message at the bottom.

allegations of israeli apartheid page

It'd be great if you could join in on the development of this page. Gatoclass is trying to put all criticisms in a "Criticism" section, rather than having specific ones accompany the claims they criticize. I disagree with this (see talk page), but I'd like your opinion too.--Urthogie 20:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Inaccurate characterizations of edits on Talk:Allegations of Israeli apartheid

You have inaccurately characterized my edits on the Allegations of Israeli Apartheid talk page.

I wrote two comments directed at you.

1. The exchange opened with you adding a link to google as if it were a source here
2. I was the first editor to object (→Allegations of Israeli apartheid and Blood Libel against Israel - linking to google is silly, and wastes all of our time), writing But why bother providing links to a search page? (I forgot to sign... signature was added after)
3. Your first accusation was ridiculous, I ignored it: (→Allegations of Israeli apartheid and Blood Libel against Israel - no personal attacks, please)
4. You replaced your google link with a link to an article by David Horowitz: (→Allegations of Israeli apartheid and Blood Libel against Israel - source provided; please restore my contribution that you reverted)
5. As your new link was to an article that did not use the word apartheid a single time, I responded more strongly (→Allegations of Israeli apartheid and Blood Libel against Israel - cit not on topic) I included a stern warning: If you continue with this kind of editing, it will be understandable if other editors have trouble taking your contributions seriously
6. You responded, accusing me of a personal attack (→Allegations of Israeli apartheid and Blood Libel against Israel - more personal attacks). You wrote: Indeed, Jd2718 gets credit for that personal attack. You get credit for the others. Also, you redirected another comment at me: Jd2718, now in the edit summary of the above unsigned post, you accuse me of vandalizing the article. You wrote, "is this just an excuse to continue vandalizing the article?" This is disruptive behavior. Please stop it.

There is nothing in the record that justifies the comments you directed at me (#3 and #6, above). There is no call for misquoting another editor. There is no call for falsely characterizing another editor's comments as "gratuitous personal attacks," as "disruptive," or as violating "WP:ATTACK"

This is the only warning I will put on your talk page. I expect a retraction, on the talk page where you made the inaccurate statements.