Revision as of 09:43, 23 April 2005

User posts: 4 September 2024

now this is a personal attack

"Stop being silly, do you have some sort of sick wet dream to stare at a dead naked woman? Or do you enjoy staring at dead chineese? Not everyone likes to see the pictures, but people can read." diff — Davenbelle 06:47, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

Not quite

I dont see that as a personal attack, you are welcome to fill a complaint though. Please stop reverting a topic which you are not a part of the discussion. There are things we agreed in the disucssion(s) and agreements long before I arrived at the article. Ignoring concensius is not good practice and waistes my and your time. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 06:49, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Well I see it as an entirely obvious one; and I note that you archived your talk page within minutes of my first posting it here. — Davenbelle 07:03, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

I archive it whenever I wish, I dont have to archive either. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 07:06, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Of course you're free to archive six minutes after a post such as mine; you're free to do it a second time after I reply. And I'm free to re-post this here while you sit-out your three revert rule violation block -- one of which was accompanied by the above edit summary. — Davenbelle 09:40, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{User:Coolcat/Talk Template}}
 = User posts: {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} =
+== now this is a personal attack ==
+:''"Stop being silly, do you have some sort of sick wet dream to stare at a dead naked woman? Or do you enjoy staring at dead chineese? Not everyone likes to see the pictures, but people can read."'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nanjing_Massacre&diff=12697968&oldid=12696849 diff] &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Davenbelle|Davenbelle]] 06:47, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
+===Not quite===
+I dont see that as a personal attack, you are welcome to fill a complaint though. Please stop reverting a topic which you are not a part of the discussion. There are things we agreed in the disucssion(s) and agreements long before I arrived at the article. Ignoring concensius is not good practice and waistes my and your time. --[[User:Coolcat|Cool Cat]] [[User talk:Coolcat|<sup>My Talk</sup>]] 06:49, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
+: Well I see it as an entirely obvious one; and I note that you archived your talk page within minutes of my first posting it here. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Davenbelle|Davenbelle]] 07:03, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
+I archive it whenever I wish, I dont have to archive either. --[[User:Coolcat|Cool Cat]] [[User talk:Coolcat|<sup>My Talk</sup>]] 07:06, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
+: Of course you're free to archive [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACoolcat&diff=12698489&oldid=12698186 six minutes after] a post such as mine; you're free to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACoolcat&diff=12701684&oldid=12699092 do it a second time] after I reply. And I'm free to re-post this here while you sit-out your [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR#User:Coolcat_2|three revert rule violation block]] -- one of which was accompanied by the above edit summary. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Davenbelle|Davenbelle]] 09:40, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)