Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Bishonen

Bishonen on IRC

Comments bishonen made in response to my comments on her RFA which further incriminate her -- she seeks validation with the IRC herd (emphasis mine):

 [14:30:28] <bishfreak> sj, did you  see Nathan commenting today?
 [14:30:37] <_sj_> hmm, where?
 [14:30:39] <bishfreak> confirming his vote?
 [14:30:43] <_sj_> ctz: thar's plans afoot, son
 [14:30:46] <bishfreak> my RFA
 [14:30:50] <_sj_> yikes
 [14:31:09] * _sj_ finishes a slightly baffled email
 [14:31:19] <bishfreak> sj, i don't have to answer every really dumb comment, do I? I'm not sure what the etiquette is
 [14:31:32] <cimon> captchas could be used for page move, but not gardeb variety editing
 [14:31:41] * Lubaf is trying to figure out what new pieces could be included in Chip's Challenge.
 [14:31:47] <CryptoDerk> etiquette on RFA is not to go crazy when replying to people
 [14:31:50] <bishfreak> sj, he does such a good job of making himself look bad, i don't have to chip in, I thought
 [14:32:04] <Lubaf> A fleer?
 [14:32:09] <bishfreak> CryptoDerk: yeah, but is it ok to not reply at all?
 [14:32:37] <CryptoDerk> I'd give it a day and if nobody else takes up the cause, feel free, but only if your RFA is in danger of  failing or something
   [14:32:59] <CryptoDerk> people who sit on their RFA waiting for people to reply make me a bit wary, but I can't speak for other editors
 [14:33:10] <CryptoDerk> same with updating the edit count
 [14:33:12] <CryptoDerk> er
 [14:33:16] <CryptoDerk> not edit count.. vote tally
 [14:34:14] <bishfreak> but d'you reckon i'm free to NOT reply?
 [14:34:23] <_sj_> yes.
 [14:34:24] * CryptoDerk is trying to look
 [14:34:25] <bishfreak> IMO nobody need take up the cause

And just 2 hours after that she seeks validation with other wikipedians regarding my edit yet again. This time she decides to go offline in a private medium with kim to spew vitriol so that she doesn't further incriminate herself:

 [16:34:33] <kim_bruning> hey bishonen!
 [16:34:42] <bishonen> kim, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Bishonen&diff=13184258&oldid=13178744
 [16:34:48] <bishonen> hey hey!
 [...]
 [16:38:28] <kim_bruning> bishonen, and do you have an IM client? (like MSN or Yahoo, or AIM, or whatever?)
 [16:38:40] <phils> we really don't have many poor here...
 [16:38:41] * Joins: iMeowbot_ (~imeowbot@pool-70-22-140-248.bos.east.verizon.net)
 [16:38:42] <bishonen> mindspillage: if he comes back for more, it might be worth posting a bit more of the IRC log, if you know what I mean. not otherwise.
 [This is followed by insults against me by the #wikipedia herd, but I haven't included them for brevity.  
 She intentionally posted the link a 'second time because she didn't get the insult based validation that she got the first time.
 In fact, I'm writing this as she speaks, she even pasted the url a third time to make sure more people saw it.]
 [16:45:55] <bishonen> nathan, you count very well!

It's not exactly appropriate for her to go seek validation online and encourage the herd to not respond to me just so she can avoid be xpoed for what she is. And as you notice, bishonen is sitting there hour-by-hour and minute-by-minute watching for changes on her RFA as she wantes to be assured that she will get in. This is further evidence of her actively engaging in over-eagerly behavior to ensure admin status--something which is not indicative of objective behavior. Objective administrators don't seek constantly seek validation and work to absolutely ensure that everyone is on their side, nor do they go into private conversations to talk about a dissenter behind their back. -Nathan J. Yoder 20:44, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

You probably missed my comment earlier on channel - posting logs from #wikipedia is against the channel policy - please see http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC_channels -- sannse (talk) 21:27, 3 May 2005 (UTC)