Jump to content

User talk:MapsMan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs)
m Automated archival of 3 sections to User talk:Superbfc/Archive 2007
Hello
Line 67: Line 67:


I do not understand what kind of coordinates would you like for [[Danube-Tisa-Danube Canal]]. The English article does not explain that adequately, but DTD canal is a network of small canals covering most of Bačka and Banat. Its coordinates are practically same for the entire [[Vojvodina]]. [http://www.plovput.co.yu/pp_navigacija.htm This] is interactive map where if you choose "kanal DTD" you can see all the canals highlighted. The map is of course copyrighted. [[User:Shinhan|Shinhan]] 21:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I do not understand what kind of coordinates would you like for [[Danube-Tisa-Danube Canal]]. The English article does not explain that adequately, but DTD canal is a network of small canals covering most of Bačka and Banat. Its coordinates are practically same for the entire [[Vojvodina]]. [http://www.plovput.co.yu/pp_navigacija.htm This] is interactive map where if you choose "kanal DTD" you can see all the canals highlighted. The map is of course copyrighted. [[User:Shinhan|Shinhan]] 21:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

== Hello ==

Nice post on the suicide userbox deletion review! I see that you've had more than 3000 mainspace edits, would you like to consider an admin nomination? If you are too shy to self-nominate, I can nominate you there. Regards. [[User:Wooyi|Wooyi]]<sup>[[User talk:Wooyi|Talk to me?]]</sup> 21:55, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:55, 19 May 2007

superbfc (talkcontribscountlogspage movesblock logemail)

This is the talk page where you can send questions and comments to Superbfc.

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:Superbfc/Archive 2024. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Archives
20062007


First thing you must understand before engaging a revert is. I am right, I'm not wasting my time telling if I didn't know I was. Réseau Saint-Lazare is not part of the Transilien. Transilien is a brand of serives that run on Réseau Saint-Lazare and other networks. Réseau Saint-Lazare access Transilien branded services as well TER Haute Normandie and Intercité services. There is no relation between Réseau Saint-Lazare and Transilien that warrants it being placed in Transilien due to the parenthood relation it holds. Add Transilien in the réseaux, not the réseaux in Transilien. The very badly edits Transilien articles, Montparnasse, Est et al are appropriately categorised in Transilien. Do not mistake Réseau Saint-Lazare and Transilien Saint-Lazare. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 18:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apostrophe

I won't take grammar lessons from somebody who uses a word like "unappropriate".
How mature of you. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 09:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Transilien

On the other hand, I can see your logic in the Transilien matter; however, there is a massive Transilien logo in the article! It is therefore either misleading or contradictory to have one and not the other.
Perhaps you should see "Venn diagram" to understand why if a something is not entirely in a category, it still might justify inclusion as it is still part of it.
The way I see it, yes, RSL is wholly within Réseau Ouest, but in terms of population/passengers, a greal deal of it also forms part of Transilien. I also looked within and noticed Réseau Est was also included.
I'm frustrated at this, because I feel you have reverted my good faith attempt in a quite arrogant way before even attempting to take this to a wider discussion.
You feel frustrated because you didn't expect nor accept anyone disagree with your edits. In your text above you seem to confirm then confusion I'm desesperatly trying to convert: The way I see it, yes, RSL is wholly within Réseau Ouest, but in terms of population/passengers, a greal deal of it also forms part of Transilien. No, I must repeat, RSL does not form part of Transilien, Transilien forms part of RSL. I also looked within Category:Transilien and noticed Réseau Est was also included. Then feel free to remove it.
Perhaps you should see "Venn diagram" to understand why if a something is not entirely in a category, it still might justify inclusion as it is still part of it. I was considering drawing you a diagram since you clearly don't understand, I won't however, since I no longer upload media to Wikipedia. There is such a thing in Wikipedia as redundancy where article and media aren't categorised in daughter categories. RSL is in no way included in Transilien, once you understand the branding and network difference, I'm sure you'll agree, if you do view Transilien as an operator, owner, network then we're in trouble. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 09:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand what kind of coordinates would you like for Danube-Tisa-Danube Canal. The English article does not explain that adequately, but DTD canal is a network of small canals covering most of Bačka and Banat. Its coordinates are practically same for the entire Vojvodina. This is interactive map where if you choose "kanal DTD" you can see all the canals highlighted. The map is of course copyrighted. Shinhan 21:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Nice post on the suicide userbox deletion review! I see that you've had more than 3000 mainspace edits, would you like to consider an admin nomination? If you are too shy to self-nominate, I can nominate you there. Regards. WooyiTalk to me? 21:55, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]