Jump to content

Lotus 96 and Lotus 96T: Difference between pages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
 
Created page with 'The Lotus type 96T was Team Lotus’s last Indycar. The project was the brainchild of former Formula 2 team owner Roy Winkelmann. During the 1960’s Winklemann ha...'
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The Lotus type 96T was Team Lotus’s last Indycar.
The Lotus type 96T was Team Lotus’s last Indycar.


The project was the brainchild of former Formula 2 team owner Roy Winkelmann. During the 1960’s Winklemann had proved successful running Brabhams and scoring successes with Jochan Rindt. However this team was to break up suddenly in 1969 with some of the core personnel (including Alan Rees) forming March engineering.
The project was the brainchild of former Formula 2 team owner Roy Winkelmann. During the 1960’s Winklemann had proved successful running Brabhams and scoring successes with Jochan Rindt. However this team was to break up suddenly in 1969 with some of the core personnel (including Alan Rees) forming March engineering.


Winklemann then relocated himself in the United States and built up a large and diverse business empire. Following the creation of the CART series in 1979 Winklemann saw a perceived blossoming of international interest and was once again lured to an opportunity to race again. However he did not wish to buy an “off-the-shelf” March or Lola chassis as was de rigueur in CART racing during the 1980s. Instead he initially approached Cosworth and obtained some assurances that they would be prepared to build “works” engines for his team. All teams in the championship were effectively running second-hand DFX engines at this point, with little input from Cosworth.
Winklemann then relocated himself in the United States and built up a large and diverse business empire. Following the creation of the CART series in 1979 Winklemann saw a perceived blossoming of international interest and was once again lured to an opportunity to race again. However he did not wish to buy an “off-the-shelf” March or Lola chassis as was de rigueur in CART racing during the 1980s. Instead he initially approached Cosworth and obtained some assurances that they would be prepared to build “works” engines for his team. All teams in the championship were effectively running second-hand DFX engines at this point, with little input from Cosworth.


Winklemann then approached Team Lotus and their new designer Gerald Ducarouge to obtain a bespoke chassis with the plan of competing and conquering CART within three years.
Winklemann then approached Team Lotus and their new designer Gerald Ducarouge to obtain a bespoke chassis with the plan of competing and conquering CART within three years.


The 96T was Ducarogue’s response to these requirements. Its tub, lines and suspension were similar to the type 95T that was racing in the 1984 Formula One Championships, but with one significant design alteration. Ducarouge had foreseen that the car stood the very real possibility of hitting a concrete retaining wall at over 200mph. Therefore the chassis was modified.
The 96T was Ducarogue’s response to these requirements. Its tub, lines and suspension were similar to the type 95T that was racing in the 1984 Formula One Championships, but with one significant design alteration. Ducarouge had foreseen that the car stood the very real possibility of hitting a concrete retaining wall at over 200mph. Therefore the chassis was modified.


Since 1981 all Formula one Lotus’s had been constructed of a carbon/Kevlar (Chapman Tartan) sandwich with the void between the two filled with Nomex paper foil. The type 96 departed from this by having the void filled with a lightweight aluminium-foil honeycomb. This modification was significant as it built in extra strength at no cost to weight and was to lay the foundations for all future Lotus Formula 1 chassis.
Since 1981 all Formula one Lotus’s had been constructed of a carbon/Kevlar (Chapman Tartan) sandwich with the void between the two filled with Nomex paper foil. The type 96 departed from this by having the void filled with a lightweight aluminium-foil honeycomb. This modification was significant as it built in extra strength at no cost to weight and was to lay the foundations for all future Lotus Formula 1 chassis.


Despite the project’s promising beginnings it was to be the American CART establishments lack of enthusiasm (interpreted by some as outward hostility) for a “works team” that was to effectively kill this project. The repercussions of this were to virtually guarantee none of the sponsorship that Winklemann had originally been so confident of. Also with a lack of sponsorship many drivers were not willing to sacrifice their growing reputations with an unknown European team, despite the legacy that team came with.
Despite the project’s promising beginnings it was to be the American CART establishments lack of enthusiasm (interpreted by some as outward hostility) for a “works team” that was to effectively kill this project. The repercussions of this were to virtually guarantee none of the sponsorship that Winklemann had originally been so confident of. Also with a lack of sponsorship many drivers were not willing to sacrifice their growing reputations with an unknown European team, despite the legacy that team came with

Revision as of 17:25, 6 June 2007

The Lotus type 96T was Team Lotus’s last Indycar.

The project was the brainchild of former Formula 2 team owner Roy Winkelmann. During the 1960’s Winklemann had proved successful running Brabhams and scoring successes with Jochan Rindt. However this team was to break up suddenly in 1969 with some of the core personnel (including Alan Rees) forming March engineering.

Winklemann then relocated himself in the United States and built up a large and diverse business empire. Following the creation of the CART series in 1979 Winklemann saw a perceived blossoming of international interest and was once again lured to an opportunity to race again. However he did not wish to buy an “off-the-shelf” March or Lola chassis as was de rigueur in CART racing during the 1980s. Instead he initially approached Cosworth and obtained some assurances that they would be prepared to build “works” engines for his team. All teams in the championship were effectively running second-hand DFX engines at this point, with little input from Cosworth.

Winklemann then approached Team Lotus and their new designer Gerald Ducarouge to obtain a bespoke chassis with the plan of competing and conquering CART within three years.

The 96T was Ducarogue’s response to these requirements. Its tub, lines and suspension were similar to the type 95T that was racing in the 1984 Formula One Championships, but with one significant design alteration. Ducarouge had foreseen that the car stood the very real possibility of hitting a concrete retaining wall at over 200mph. Therefore the chassis was modified.

Since 1981 all Formula one Lotus’s had been constructed of a carbon/Kevlar (Chapman Tartan) sandwich with the void between the two filled with Nomex paper foil. The type 96 departed from this by having the void filled with a lightweight aluminium-foil honeycomb. This modification was significant as it built in extra strength at no cost to weight and was to lay the foundations for all future Lotus Formula 1 chassis.

Despite the project’s promising beginnings it was to be the American CART establishments lack of enthusiasm (interpreted by some as outward hostility) for a “works team” that was to effectively kill this project. The repercussions of this were to virtually guarantee none of the sponsorship that Winklemann had originally been so confident of. Also with a lack of sponsorship many drivers were not willing to sacrifice their growing reputations with an unknown European team, despite the legacy that team came with