Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World of Greyhawk Fantasy Game Setting: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
'''Speedy keep and snowball''' - The AfD was discussed on the talk page and the consensus was that the article should not be nominated for deletion. The article lists 2 references asserting notability |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This book of gaming instructions has no independent source demonstrating [WP:NOTABILITY |
This book of gaming instructions has no independent source demonstrating [WP:NOTABILITY |
||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science fiction|list of Science fiction & fantasy deletions]]. </small> <small>--[[User:Gavin.collins|Gavin Collins]] 04:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)</small> |
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science fiction|list of Science fiction & fantasy deletions]]. </small> <small>--[[User:Gavin.collins|Gavin Collins]] 04:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)</small> |
||
'''Speedy keep and snowball''' - The AfD was discussed on the talk page and the consensus was that the article should not be nominated for deletion. The article lists 2 references asserting notability. It's hard to assume that this is anything but a bad faith AfD nomination considering the nominator's editing history and the recent discussion on the talk page of this article and on the nominator's personal talk page. [[User:Rray|Rray]] 04:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:25, 4 October 2007
World of Greyhawk Fantasy Game Setting
- World of Greyhawk Fantasy Game Setting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This book of gaming instructions has no independent source demonstrating [WP:NOTABILITY
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction & fantasy deletions. --Gavin Collins 04:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy keep and snowball - The AfD was discussed on the talk page and the consensus was that the article should not be nominated for deletion. The article lists 2 references asserting notability. It's hard to assume that this is anything but a bad faith AfD nomination considering the nominator's editing history and the recent discussion on the talk page of this article and on the nominator's personal talk page. Rray 04:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)