Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Hiberniantears 2: Difference between revisions
m create page |
|||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
=====Support===== |
=====Support===== |
||
#This user will become an ideal administrator, because he never adds any new information to the articles, but instead prefers to arbitrarily edit/delete the information added by others, such as completely removing a paragraph without asking for the opinion of those who added it, or changing the position of the dots and commas, even if they don't make any improvement or correct a grammar fault. A person who takes great pleasure of spending his time with such work will be an awesome administrator. He has also shown how "worthy" he is by constantly reporting the users which he dislikes through private messages to the admins, and managing to get some of them banned. He will become a great "vice" for the pre-existing admins, in short. |
|||
# |
|||
=====Oppose===== |
=====Oppose===== |
||
Revision as of 16:21, 13 October 2007
Voice your opinion (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 06:41, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Hiberniantears (talk · contribs) - It is my pleasure to nominate Hiberniantears, a long standing and trustworthy editor for adminship. I came to know him through the adoption process where he kindly offered to take me under his belt. As I often questioned him on aspects of Wikipedia I was unsure of, he demonstrated that he had a sound knowledge of Wikipedia policies, and is generous in the help he gives me and other editors such as here.
Hiberniantears has a pretty well rounded editing time; he has nominated a WP:SSP here, has participated in multiple WP:AFDs, has around 50 reports to WP:AIV which are solid and led to blocks, and has done WP:CSD tagging. His participation in WP:RCP has been good where he warns the vandals as well. Through my overview of his edits he has demonstrated a calm and helpful demeanour and has a definite need for the tools through his frequent reporting of vandals. His contribution has been sustained, and although there were some issues in his previous RfA regarding lack of experience, I sincerely believe he has those bases covered now. Phgao 06:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- A:
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A:
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:
General comments
- Links for Hiberniantears: Hiberniantears (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Hiberniantears before commenting.
Discussion
Support
- This user will become an ideal administrator, because he never adds any new information to the articles, but instead prefers to arbitrarily edit/delete the information added by others, such as completely removing a paragraph without asking for the opinion of those who added it, or changing the position of the dots and commas, even if they don't make any improvement or correct a grammar fault. A person who takes great pleasure of spending his time with such work will be an awesome administrator. He has also shown how "worthy" he is by constantly reporting the users which he dislikes through private messages to the admins, and managing to get some of them banned. He will become a great "vice" for the pre-existing admins, in short.