Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Henry Brett, Jr.: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Smashville (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
***Here are the ones I tried...[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elias Wen|Elias Wen]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Carroll|Emma Carroll]], and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consuelo Moreno-López|Consuela Moreno Lopez]]. I withdrew the noms when I saw the way they were heading. --[[User:Smashville|'''Smashville''']][[User Talk:Smashville|<sup style="color:#03F">BONK!</sup>]] 19:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC) |
***Here are the ones I tried...[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elias Wen|Elias Wen]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Carroll|Emma Carroll]], and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consuelo Moreno-López|Consuela Moreno Lopez]]. I withdrew the noms when I saw the way they were heading. --[[User:Smashville|'''Smashville''']][[User Talk:Smashville|<sup style="color:#03F">BONK!</sup>]] 19:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - per nom. Notice the article say it is not even sure he was as old as he claimed to be, so the entire record seems like a hoax... Oldest person to undergo surgery does not make you notable, I would say. [[User:Greswik|Greswik]] ([[User talk:Greswik|talk]]) 18:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - per nom. Notice the article say it is not even sure he was as old as he claimed to be, so the entire record seems like a hoax... Oldest person to undergo surgery does not make you notable, I would say. [[User:Greswik|Greswik]] ([[User talk:Greswik|talk]]) 18:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' possibly oldest person in the world is definately notable. [[User:Kitia|''[[User:Kitia|Kitia]]'']] ([[User talk:Kitia|talk]]) 20:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:26, 8 December 2007
- James Henry Brett, Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Fails WP:BIO (no substantial coverage in relaible sources; one of the two refs provided is trivial, and the other is a dead link to a website apparently maintained by the editor who added the link, and appears in any case to be content reposted from a mailing list. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Reluctant Keep. The results of these AfDs have shown that being the oldest person at one period in time in a single state is considered notable. Thus, oldest person in the world would be. --SmashvilleBONK! 17:39, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Reply The two recent examples I have seen are both being contested at DRV. In any case, AfD is not bound by precedent, and what's the point of keeping an article which will remain unreferenced against reliable sources? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:53, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Here are the ones I tried...Elias Wen, Emma Carroll, and Consuela Moreno Lopez. I withdrew the noms when I saw the way they were heading. --SmashvilleBONK! 19:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Reply The two recent examples I have seen are both being contested at DRV. In any case, AfD is not bound by precedent, and what's the point of keeping an article which will remain unreferenced against reliable sources? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:53, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Notice the article say it is not even sure he was as old as he claimed to be, so the entire record seems like a hoax... Oldest person to undergo surgery does not make you notable, I would say. Greswik (talk) 18:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep possibly oldest person in the world is definately notable. ''[[User:Kitia|Kitia]]'' (talk) 20:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC)