Talk:Islamic views on slavery: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:52, 1 July 2005

HI guys ,

Well this is the first major reformation of this article . Open for dicuussation, as always

removed the intro section , Islam not only means slavery , secondly this isnt relevant here , since being a slave of Allah , & being a slave are totally different concepts .

Muhammad's slaves.......authentic sources required !!!!

Slaves in Islamic history , this whole thing is discuued in slavery article . No need to repeat the same thing again & again.

Sexual slavery .... again authentic sources required about what traditional madhabs say .

Regarding what has been happening in different muslim majority regions , the right place is slavery article, sice slavery going on in all the places of the world is discussed there .

This article is specific to slavery in Islam. A lot of the content once was in the Islam article and the group consensus was move it to its own article. I predicted back then that if we did that then the next step would be that the Muslim activists in Wikipedia would then proceed to cut it down to nothing. This of course is exactly as I predicted. The next step will be to re-insert the article into the Islam article since the agreed upon solution failed.--Urchid 1 July 2005 23:52 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:14, 1 July 2005 edit Farhansher (talk \| contribs) 2,663 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:52, 1 July 2005 edit undo Urchid (talk \| contribs) 199 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Regarding what has been happening in different muslim majority regions , the right place is slavery article, sice slavery going on in all the places of the world is discussed there .		Regarding what has been happening in different muslim majority regions , the right place is slavery article, sice slavery going on in all the places of the world is discussed there .

			:This article is specific to slavery in Islam. A lot of the content once was in the Islam article and the group consensus was move it to its own article. I predicted back then that if we did that then the next step would be that the Muslim activists in Wikipedia would then proceed to cut it down to nothing. This of course is exactly as I predicted. The next step will be to re-insert the article into the Islam article since the agreed upon solution failed.--[[User:Urchid\|Urchid]] 1 July 2005 23:52 (UTC)