Jump to content

Talk:Social network aggregation: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Spawn Man (talk | contribs)
replied
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
::Take a look at this [[Wikipedia:Article]] [[User:Igorberger|Igor Berger]] ([[User talk:Igorberger|talk]]) 08:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
::Take a look at this [[Wikipedia:Article]] [[User:Igorberger|Igor Berger]] ([[User talk:Igorberger|talk]]) 08:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
:I agree with Igor here - I ''had'' prodded it for similar reasons and the article really doesn't make any sense. It's a mix between a NN Neogolism, a company advertisement and external link article. I support deletion. Cheers, [[User:Spawn Man|Spawn Man]] ([[User talk:Spawn Man|talk]]) 08:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
:I agree with Igor here - I ''had'' prodded it for similar reasons and the article really doesn't make any sense. It's a mix between a NN Neogolism, a company advertisement and external link article. I support deletion. Cheers, [[User:Spawn Man|Spawn Man]] ([[User talk:Spawn Man|talk]]) 08:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
:Igor I have used your suggestion and the article is now at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ujwaltickoo/Social_Network_Aggregation I hope that other contributors will help edit and improve the article. As far as Spawn Man's opinions about the article "not making sense" -- its his personal perspective. To the criticism that it is a company advertisement -- I have used text from my own blog -- giving Wikipedia the rights over the text I typed. If some other user can bring the same set of ideas from other source -- good! I am not interested in a pesonal ad or fight with a person but contributing an article which is important and I have given supporting data. Thanks

Revision as of 09:11, 10 January 2008

Social Network Aggregation is a new trend in the Social Network Services Space. In Oct 2007 Social Thing got funded for $ 300 K as noted by Mashable. There are over 25 startups working in this area such as Spokeo, 8Hands, Profilefly. What is "not notable" about it? Is it the new author who is not notable because s/he is not "well known" in the existing network or a personal bias? Please give clear hard data to defend your point or suggest changes that will help the article remain. Thanks

Please follow the guidelines in building a WikiPedia article. Igor Berger (talk) 08:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look at this Wikipedia:Article Igor Berger (talk) 08:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Igor here - I had prodded it for similar reasons and the article really doesn't make any sense. It's a mix between a NN Neogolism, a company advertisement and external link article. I support deletion. Cheers, Spawn Man (talk) 08:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Igor I have used your suggestion and the article is now at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ujwaltickoo/Social_Network_Aggregation I hope that other contributors will help edit and improve the article. As far as Spawn Man's opinions about the article "not making sense" -- its his personal perspective. To the criticism that it is a company advertisement -- I have used text from my own blog -- giving Wikipedia the rights over the text I typed. If some other user can bring the same set of ideas from other source -- good! I am not interested in a pesonal ad or fight with a person but contributing an article which is important and I have given supporting data. Thanks