Talk:Tropical Storm Lorenzo (2001): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:17, 28 January 2008

Template:Hurricane

Todo

Dates would be nice in the lede. - Done
Most articles say 'Y was the 13th storm of the season; that'd be nice to have in the lede - Done
Lorenzo was also the last storm of four to form in October - This is a bit confusing, since Michelle also formed in October. Either remove the sentence, or say something like Lorenzo was the last of four named storms in October - Done
A wikilink to baroclinic system would be nice - Done
At the beginning - As in, in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, or more like Upon first forming - Done
but this did not happen as - can be replaced with a simple though - Done
Fix the typos - Done
did not predicted - fix the grammar - Done
When and where did it dissipate? - Done
Was it ever forecasted to pass near the Azores
Any ship observations? - Done
Change the damage in the infobox to none - Done
A more thorough storm history, with specific information from each discussion, might help lengthen the article

--♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the sentences are a bit redundant, such as "By 1800 UTC, the forecasters at the National Hurricane Center predicted that a nearby front would absorb to-be Extratropical Storm Lorenzo" - that forecast isn't that important, since the storm actually did it. Same with, "with the storm forecasted to continue to the right". Did you check Gary Padgett for any more Met. info? He might be able to provide more for pre-NHC. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, this article should not exist. The main article is God. If you can't put more than a paragraph of something besides storm history, then it should stay in the main article. I've said this for years, my stance has not changed. This article scattering is reducing the purpose of main article. Copying and pasting an NHC report on a crap storm is not okay. I don't care if it's in the public domain, it's bad form. I don't know why people continue to think this is a good idea. It's like a plague. Pretty soon, we'll be having and article for Storm Three in the 1937 Atlantic season. -- §HurricaneERICarchive 22:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:12, 10 January 2008 edit Hurricanehink (talk \| contribs) Administrators 60,245 edits +{{hurricane}} ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:17, 28 January 2008 edit undo E. Brown (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,707 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:Some of the sentences are a bit redundant, such as "By 1800 UTC, the forecasters at the National Hurricane Center predicted that a nearby front would absorb to-be Extratropical Storm Lorenzo" - that forecast isn't that important, since the storm actually did it. Same with, "with the storm forecasted to continue to the right". Did you check Gary Padgett for any more Met. info? He might be able to provide more for pre-NHC. --♬♩ [[User:Hurricanehink\|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink\|talk]]</small>) 02:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)		:Some of the sentences are a bit redundant, such as "By 1800 UTC, the forecasters at the National Hurricane Center predicted that a nearby front would absorb to-be Extratropical Storm Lorenzo" - that forecast isn't that important, since the storm actually did it. Same with, "with the storm forecasted to continue to the right". Did you check Gary Padgett for any more Met. info? He might be able to provide more for pre-NHC. --♬♩ [[User:Hurricanehink\|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink\|talk]]</small>) 02:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

			::For the record, this article should not exist. The main article is God. If you can't put more than a paragraph of something besides storm history, then it should stay in the main article. I've said this for years, my stance has not changed. This article scattering is reducing the purpose of main article. Copying and pasting an NHC report on a crap storm is not okay. I don't care if it's in the public domain, it's bad form. I don't know why people continue to think this is a good idea. It's like a plague. Pretty soon, we'll be having and article for Storm Three in the 1937 Atlantic season. -- <font color="gold">[[WP:TROP\|§]]</font>[[User talk: E. Brown\|Hurricane]]<font color="black">[[Special:Emailuser/E._Brown\|E]]</font><font color="red">[[User:E. Brown\|RIC]]</font><small>''[[Special:Contributions/E. Brown\|archive]]''</small> 22:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)