User:Newbyguesses/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Newbyguesses (talk | contribs) m us |
Newbyguesses (talk | contribs) m lorem ipsum |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Centralized discussion== |
|||
My (User:newbyguesses) preferred approach to communicating on talk-pages is to say what needs to be said, even if an obvious point is restated, use ONE colorful image if it conveys the point accurately, and not waste words. I also try to say thankyou at the beginning and end of every post - I think that's important. |
|||
In a discussion, NBG is usually willing to expose all the cards in his hand at the ante, and to then pick them up and play reasonably close to the chest. |
|||
Any observant player who is willing to AGF towards Newbyguesses has a good chance of being able to discern NBG's intentions and methods. '''Civility''' trumps all other cards, and ''transparency'' is the only mechanism that I know of that is capable of being relied upon to best circumvent conspiracy, and expose untruthfullness. That is what I understand as the main value of centralized discussion. |
|||
==Apology accepted== |
|||
I will apologise if proved to have been wrong, or done harm, and I am made aware of it. I will correct my own errors when I detect them. |
|||
I will ask for a correction or an apology if I see mis-direction or I feel I have been wronged. |
|||
Thanks, |
|||
Revision as of 00:26, 24 February 2008
Centralized discussion
My (User:newbyguesses) preferred approach to communicating on talk-pages is to say what needs to be said, even if an obvious point is restated, use ONE colorful image if it conveys the point accurately, and not waste words. I also try to say thankyou at the beginning and end of every post - I think that's important. In a discussion, NBG is usually willing to expose all the cards in his hand at the ante, and to then pick them up and play reasonably close to the chest.
Any observant player who is willing to AGF towards Newbyguesses has a good chance of being able to discern NBG's intentions and methods. Civility trumps all other cards, and transparency is the only mechanism that I know of that is capable of being relied upon to best circumvent conspiracy, and expose untruthfullness. That is what I understand as the main value of centralized discussion.
Apology accepted
I will apologise if proved to have been wrong, or done harm, and I am made aware of it. I will correct my own errors when I detect them. I will ask for a correction or an apology if I see mis-direction or I feel I have been wronged.
Thanks,