Revision as of 17:32, 2 June 2002

Conscription has been one of the fundamentals of many political organisation (think of the Athenian 'Pyle', the Roman farmer-soldier, the Saxon 'Fyrd', etc. Josh will probably know some better examples) Please correct me, but conscription is more ancient than the professional soldiery, which, if I remember correctly, was introduced in Rome by Marius in the second (or first?) century B.C. -- Mathijs

maybe not so much conscription as the EXPECTATION of universal service for those eligible. That seems to be true of hoplite warfare. The Romans practiced conscription in the Punic wars, though I don't know if we know how they handled it. --MichaelTinkler

==

Feb 26 2002: wondering if the list of generals should be elsewhere, or at least classified by conflicts. --Christopher mahan

I can see a problem with classifying by conflict -- lots of duplicate links...Just think of Kitchener, Gordon, Patton, Custer.... J Hofmann Kemp

Hum, I've been seeing plural entries beginning to pop up here and there that are just lists of links. I'm not sure if I really like the practice, but I do see the utility of such a scheme. Would an article named Famous generals be out of line? --maveric149

Feb 27 2002: I think that if there is an article for famous generals (or Famous military commanders) there needs to be a minimal summary for each, such as conflicts involved in and life defining events. --Christopher Mahan

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ====
-Feb 26 2002
+Feb 26 2002:
 wondering if the list of generals should be elsewhere, or at least classified by conflicts. --[[user:chris mahan|Christopher mahan]]
 :I can see a problem with classifying by conflict -- lots of duplicate links...Just think of Kitchener, Gordon, Patton, Custer.... [[user:J Hofmann Kemp|J Hofmann Kemp]]
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 :Hum, I've been seeing plural entries beginning to pop up here and there that are just lists of links. I'm not sure if I really like the practice, but I do see the utility of such a scheme. Would an article named [[Famous generals]] be out of line? --[[user:maveric149|maveric149]]
-Feb 27 2002
+Feb 27 2002:
 I think that if there is an article for famous generals (or [[Famous military commanders]]) there needs to be a minimal summary for each, such as conflicts involved in and life defining events. --[[user:chris mahan|Christopher Mahan]]