Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who have been pied (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
delete |
Ecoleetage (talk | contribs) Delete |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[List of people who have been pied]]=== |
===[[List of people who have been pied]]=== |
||
Please note that this has previously been nominated a bit over a year ago. I hope that times have changed for Wikipedia, as I see little to no value in providing a list of people who have been "pied", quite the contrary actually and I think [[WP:BLP]] would advise against such a list. [[User:Coccyx Bloccyx|Coccyx Bloccyx]] ([[User talk:Coccyx Bloccyx|talk]]) 19:21, 30 April 2008 (UTC) |
Please note that this has previously been nominated a bit over a year ago. I hope that times have changed for Wikipedia, as I see little to no value in providing a list of people who have been "pied", quite the contrary actually and I think [[WP:BLP]] would advise against such a list. [[User:Coccyx Bloccyx|Coccyx Bloccyx]] ([[User talk:Coccyx Bloccyx|talk]]) 19:21, 30 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' -- Not notable, unless you are a Moe Howard fan. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage|talk]]) 19:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:40, 30 April 2008
Please note that this has previously been nominated a bit over a year ago. I hope that times have changed for Wikipedia, as I see little to no value in providing a list of people who have been "pied", quite the contrary actually and I think WP:BLP would advise against such a list. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 19:21, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete -- Not notable, unless you are a Moe Howard fan. Ecoleetage (talk) 19:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)