User talk:Atari400: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Luna Santin (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by 71.107.70.47 (talk) to last version by Addbot |
Undid revision 221383853 by Luna Santin (talk) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retired}} |
|||
<center>[[Image:Qxz-ad58.gif]]</center> |
|||
<br><br> |
|||
== Regarding Asian Capitals == |
|||
*Please see the discussion page. Afghanistan is very often considered a South Asian state [[User:Thegreyanomaly|Thegreyanomaly]] 22:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Afghanistan may be considered geographically "South Asia" by many sources, which is perfectly acceptable. What does not make sense, is to <b>double list</b> the capital of Afghanistan, being Kabul, twice within a single template. It is either/or, and should only include a notation of sorts acknowledging the difference of common opinion. [[User:Atari400|Atari400]] 23:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::It does not go against academic views on the subject. I have cited many sources claiming that Afghanistan is South Asia. People have attempted to refute me and have given me a few sources claiming it as Central Asia and a few sources claiming it as the Middle East. Many scholars do say that Afghanistan is South Asian. Claims that it is disputed are true, but claims that it is an unacademic view point are entirely false[http://www.ias.berkeley.edu/southasia/aboutus.html][http://www.southasiaoutreach.wisc.edu/countries.htm][http://www.southasia.upenn.edu/home/views/languages.html][http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=washfile-english&y=2007&m=August&x=20070829160347saikceinawz0.2609064][http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1997/ofr-97-470/OF97-470C/asiaGmap.html] [[User:Thegreyanomaly|Thegreyanomaly]] 02:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::Here are 10 sources that reference Afghanistan as being in either Central Asia, the Near East or the Middle East: |
|||
::::1 - [http://menic.utexas.edu/Countries_and_Regions/Afghanistan/] |
|||
::::2 - [http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/indiv/mideast/cuvlm/Afghanistan.html] |
|||
::::3 - [http://web.utah.edu/meca/2007Conf/2007%20MECA-%20Final%20Program.pdf] |
|||
::::4 - [http://web.utah.edu/meca/2005Conf/2005-MECA-CONF-PROGRAM.pdf] |
|||
::::5 - [http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/reo/2006/eng/01/mreo0506.pdf] |
|||
::::6 - [http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/mecacs/] |
|||
::::7 - [http://www.loc.gov/rr/amed/guide/nes-iranianworld.html] |
|||
::::8 - [http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-10/29/content_6972219.htm] |
|||
::::9 - [http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/mideast/] |
|||
::::10 - [http://www.library.yale.edu/neareast/women.html] |
|||
:::Serious scholarly works tend to view Afghanistan in the cultural and social arena of the Near East and Central Asia, and very rarely in the context of South Asia. To do so generally lands in the realm of political [[irredentism|political irredentism]]. [[User:Atari400|Atari400]] 03:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*Also, I noticed that you have been requesting input on the subject. You apparently have focused on the people who are reverting my edits and have been unable to make definitive claims that Afghanistan is Central Asian. I hope you come to realize that there is a strong scholarly view that Afghanistan is South Asian and that it is not just "sometimes referred to as geographically South Asian in passing by various English language news services" [[User:Thegreyanomaly|Thegreyanomaly]] 02:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Naturally as a Wikipedia editor, I am seeking a consensus in the matter. As such, it appears that both facts and consensus numbers are leaning towards my side of the arguement. As someone with a connection to the region, I think I have a idea of what I am, and what we are. Tolerating viewpoints that may detour from reality is not in the interest of the Wikipedia project. Tolerating viewpoints that may reflect extremist nationalist ideals as the normal definition of reality are certainly not in the interest of myself or the project, either. [[User:Atari400|Atari400]] 03:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*This is just to show you that many academic sources do not consider Afghanistan to be part of Central Asian |
|||
::[http://www.geog.okstate.edu/journals/jcas/jcas.htm] Oklahoma State, only claims Afghanistan has links to Central Asia |
|||
::[http://depts.washington.edu/centasia/background.htm] does not claim Afghanistan to be Central Asian |
|||
::[http://www.indiana.edu/~rifias/RIFIAS_and_Inner_Asian_Studies.htm] only covers adjacent parts of Afghanistan |
|||
:[[User:Thegreyanomaly|Thegreyanomaly]] 02:33, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::None of these references define Afghanistan as South Asian, either. [[User:Atari400|Atari400]] 03:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Ok my commentary on your sites. 3 & 4 are the same source. You've got 10 sources, most of them either claims Afghanistan to be Middle Eastern, and the rest of them do not distinguish between ME or CA. You're claims that Afghanistan is Central Asian are not supported by your sources, at most you could use your sources and Beh-nam's sources to put Afghanistan down as Middle Eastern, but by no means Central Asian. I've got more sources for South Asia than you have for Central Asia. All you have done is proven the obvious, that Afghanistan is commonly viewed to be Middle Eastern [[User:Thegreyanomaly|Thegreyanomaly]] 23:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== i asked for help and that is your response this was the last dis i sent about the lotar page == |
|||
*I did see that you merged my page with the KAPAP page, I do understand what you are saying but It is a direct conflict of interest with my business I do understand that I have a conflict of interest as well with writing the Lotar page but the page kept getting redirected to KAPAP and it makes it seem as though the KAPAP training center is the LOTAR center and that hurts my business I am sure that you would understand this. I have asked for help many times in tiring to figure out how to solve the problem, I do not have an issue with being linked to Krav Maga but I can be linked up to KAPAP due to COPYWRITE issues between us..Once again I have put up the info on LOTAR to be reviewed with an article for source reference. Please review it and let me know if it works to help my issue... Thank you very much —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronin6969 |
|||
what you are doing is taking the copywritten name of my company and attaching it to a competetor how is that right...i have asked for help on this as well as including an artical written about lotar from a third party website and this was you response....why..how is this ok... |
|||
--[[User:Ronin6969|Ronin6969]] 20:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I see what you are saying, and I will begin the process of merging Lotar into Krav Maga, shortly. [[User:Atari400|Atari400]] 21:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== thank you very much I do appriciate the help == |
|||
I do appriciate the assistance and I can and would be happy to give you any futher info to add to the artical which will be merged with krav maga--[[User:Ronin6969|Ronin6969]] 03:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:It is done. Please view the article on [[Krav_Maga]] and [[Kapap]] to see the results of the change. [[User:Atari400|Atari400]] 06:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== sorry but here is a link to a ref artical == |
|||
ref artical on LOTAR http://www.usadojo.com/styles/about-lotar.htm |
|||
--[[User:Ronin6969|Ronin6969]] 04:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I went ahead and used your article link as a reference. [[User:Atari400|Atari400]] 20:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Algerian War== |
|||
*You reverted my changed with the explanation ” RV - See discussion”, I most ask which discussion? There isn’t one really one on the Algerian War talkpage. [[User:Carl Logan|Carl Logan]] 18:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, just to give you a heads up, I am going to add a section on genocide allegations later today, citing about a half-dozen scholarly sources. Any thoughts on the matter? <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 18:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::My initially response would be that the Algerian War wasn't a genocide, but I most admit that I am a bit hazy on what exactly is a genocide and what isn't. Another thing, do you have Ethnic cleansing and French colonial empire bit from the result in the infobox, I think any result except the Algeria became a independent state is highly questionably. [[User:Carl Logan|Carl Logan]] 18:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::Well, my reason for the addition of the tag is not to say if it was or was not a genocide, but rather it addresses the fact that certain groups and individuals have claimed it as such[http://www.turkishweekly.net/news.php?id=30263]. It is a touchy subject, and one that tends to garnish an emotional reaction for either side of the debate. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 18:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Armenians == |
|||
What reason do you have to add Armenians to that template? There are Armenians who live in Iran because of deportaions of Shah Abbas and Armenians who live in the Middle East because of the Armenian Genocide but that in no way makes Armenians middle eastern. Armenians arw classified as European Americans by virtually all states including California and the Federal government so your addition is borderline disruption if it's not a matter of simple ignorance. Please explain asap.--<big>''' [[User:Eupator|<font color=#00N510>Ευπάτωρ]] '''</font></big><sup><small>[[User_Talk:Eupator|<font color=#974423>Talk!!]]</sup></small> 22:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Lets discuss this on the templates discussion page, as I would like to here your input on the subject. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 22:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Your 'Afghans are white on the US Census' statement. == |
|||
Some links to prove that statement would be helpful. |
|||
Thanks, |
|||
[[User:Pureaswater|Pureaswater]] 23:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Here you go! '''-''' [http://www.seer.cancer.gov/manuals/2007/SPCSM_2007_AppendixD.pdf]. It is an offical U.S Census Manual from 2007, and Afghans can be found on page 3, under <b><i>white</i></b>. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 07:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
That link is not from [[Bureau of the Census]]. It is from [[National Cancer Institute]], and gives two references, both from [[Center for Disease Control]]: |
|||
#[http://www.cdc.gov/nedss/DataModels/Intro_Race_Ethnicity.pdf] (explanation) and [http://www.cdc.gov/phin/library/documents/pdf/CDC%20Race%20and%20Ethnicity%20Code%20Set%20Version%201.pdf] (data) |
|||
#[http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/4manual.pdf] |
|||
The first link for reference 1 says that CDC's classification is based on two different sets of categories, from [[Office of Management and Budget]] and [[Bureau of the Census]]. It does not state that it is identical to one of those. (and even if it did, it could be in error) |
|||
Links to prove that statement should come from census.gov. --[[User:JWB|JWB]] ([[User talk:JWB|talk]]) 03:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Dark Tea == |
|||
You should discuss this issue with Dark Tea [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dark_Tea]. |
|||
She has numerous sources to indicate otherwise. |
|||
Thanks, |
|||
[[User:Pureaswater|Pureaswater]] 23:20, 11 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, I actually was shown this source[http://www.seer.cancer.gov/manuals/2007/SPCSM_2007_AppendixD.pdf] that clearly states Afghans as being counted as "white" in the U.S, by [[User:Dark_Tea|DarkTea]]. It is an official U.S Census Manual from 2007, and Afghans can be found on page 3, under <b><i>white</i></b>.<b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 07:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Zubin Mehta == |
|||
The Asian Americans page rightfully lists him. He is an Indian of Parsi origins, meaning he is Indian. After the fall of the Sassanids and the rise of Islam in Iran, a group of Zoroastrians migrated to Gujarat for religion asylum, later spreading into other regions of India. The [[Parsis]], as their article points out, have been assimiliated and acculturate out of Iranian culutre into Indic culture, while retaining the Zoroastrianism that was greatly abandoned in Iran [[User:Thegreyanomaly|Thegreyanomaly]] 07:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, I see your point, but according to the U.S Census Bureau's SEER Program and Encoding Manual[http://www.seer.cancer.gov/manuals/2007/SPCSM_2007_AppendixD.pdf], Parsis are counted as "white" in the U.S., and this can be found on page 5 of the manual[http://www.seer.cancer.gov/manuals/2007/SPCSM_2007_AppendixD.pdf]. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 07:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for '''[[WP:EW|edit war]] on [[Shiraz blood libel]]'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. [[User:Mercury|<strong><font color="#8B7B8B" face="Verdana">M<font color="black">er<font color="black">cury</font></font></font></strong>]] 21:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> [[User:Mercury|<strong><font color="#8B7B8B" face="Verdana">M<font color="black">er<font color="black">cury</font></font></font></strong>]] 21:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*Well, at least you also blocked the other guy, to. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 22:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
I have unblocked. I do not believe it will happen again. Regards, [[User:Mercury|<strong><font color="#8B7B8B" face="Verdana">M<font color="black">er<font color="black">cury</font></font></font></strong>]] 02:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Arab slave trade == |
|||
If you want to move an article to a different name, use the "move" tab. Do not [[Wikipedia:How to fix cut-and-paste moves|cut-and-paste]] an article the way you did with [[Arab slave trade]]. When you cut and paste move the way you did, the page history of the article or talk page is left behind, making it difficult to follow the article history, which is essential for many resons, including [[GFDL]]. Also, you need to establish consensus in the articles talk page before you make a move like that. --[[User:Ezeu|Ezeu]] ([[User talk:Ezeu|talk]]) 13:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Concensus of Indosphere == |
|||
Prove your claims and show this consensus. [[User:Thegreyanomaly|Thegreyanomaly]] ([[User talk:Thegreyanomaly|talk]]) 07:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Just read through the discussion page. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 09:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
I have requested an RfC to evaluate your "concensus" [[User:Thegreyanomaly|Thegreyanomaly]] ([[User talk:Thegreyanomaly|talk]]) 07:54, 24 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:That is good. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 09:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== I had the template protected == |
|||
You wouldn't wait for the RfC, so I had the template protected. The RfC will be here within those two weeks hopefully. [[User:Thegreyanomaly|Thegreyanomaly]] ([[User talk:Thegreyanomaly|talk]]) 03:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Indosphere == |
|||
You do not have a consensus that Afghanistan and Balochistan are not part of the Indosphere. The fact that no one is around to support you and that you are the only reverting edits should be a clear enough message that you do not have consensus. Accept it. [[User:Thegreyanomaly|Thegreyanomaly]] ([[User talk:Thegreyanomaly|talk]]) 09:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I accept only cited facts. As of yet, you have given no sources to show that Afghanistan or Baluchistan belong to your notion of an "Indosphere", or a "Greater India". I am sorry, but you seem to espouse an Indian nationalistic viewpoint that as of yet, is not backed up with sources. After all, what makes Baluchistan or Afghanistan part of an Indosphere/Greater India, exactly. That has not even been addressed. More importantly, why do you even feel the need for such an inclusion? <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 09:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Your edit to Islam and slavery == |
|||
In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islam_and_slavery&curid=3140575&diff=179904553&oldid=179897556 this] diff, your edit summary "Revert - Please do not include statements without a factual link" does not explain all the changes you made. Regarding "Persians," it is sourced to the Encylcopedia of Islam. Please explain yourself. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] ([[User talk:Arrow740|talk]]) 06:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:If it is "sourced", then source it in the article. I am not about to just take your word for it. Otherwise, stop wasting everyone's time with your agenda. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 06:45, 24 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::That information is sourced to the next closest reference. Please explain the rest of your edit. It is considered bad form to make massive changes without explanation or indicating that you understand the issues involved. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] ([[User talk:Arrow740|talk]]) 08:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::Your source is not verifiable, in addition to the fact that the next closet reference does no pertain to the subject at hand. I want to see a source outside of your imagination, that shows a "Persian" aspect to the Arab slave trade. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 09:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::If you want to remove Persian, though it is sourced, that's one thing. The rest of your edit is another. If you don't undo the rest of your edit I'll make a post to AN/I. Your refusal to address this is a sign of bad faith. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] ([[User talk:Arrow740|talk]]) 09:29, 24 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::It is a sign of bad faith on your part to make sweeping changes without consensus. I only made a single edit of a statement that is unsupported by citation. I look forward to an AN/I complaint, as I will open one on your behavior myself. Your sweeping edits without consensus, coupled with a blatant agenda is not in the interests of the Wikipedia project. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 20:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::::"I only made a single edit of a statement that is unsupported by citation." Anyone who looks at the diff linked above will see that you are not telling the truth. It is incivil to revert without an edit summary or any indication you understand the issues involved. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] ([[User talk:Arrow740|talk]]) 09:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::"It is incivil to revert without an edit summary or any indication you understand the issues involved." - Why then do you habitually do the same, Arrow740? [[User:Itaqallah|<small><b><font color="#029DDD">ITAQALLAH</font></b></small>]] 14:26, 25 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::Give me an example. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] ([[User talk:Arrow740|talk]]) 23:45, 25 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::You know full well that you frequently revert without edit summary, and many times such reverts are improper. Here's a nice example.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islam_and_animals&diff=prev&oldid=180221736] [[User:Itaqallah|<small><b><font color="#029DDD">ITAQALLAH</font></b></small>]] 14:47, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::It is obvious to you that I know the issues involved. BS is trying to keep attention away from a sensitive part of the Qur'an on a pretext, when that section clearly is pertinent to animals and Islam. I've reinstated that section months ago as well. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] ([[User talk:Arrow740|talk]]) 22:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::::Your understanding of the issue is deficient, as is your understanding of [[WP:NOR]]. [[User:Itaqallah|<small><b><font color="#029DDD">ITAQALLAH</font></b></small>]] 23:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==3RR violation== |
|||
Arrow740 inded seems to have committed a 3rr violation. Will you report the user, or should I?[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] ([[User talk:Bless sins|talk]]) 08:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:On second, Arrow740 almost committed 3rr. The editor seems to have [[Wikipedia:GAME|gamed]] the system.[[User:Bless sins|Bless sins]] ([[User talk:Bless sins|talk]]) 09:11, 25 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Islam in the United States == |
|||
*For your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islam_in_the_United_States&diff=prev&oldid=178015687 here], that can be verified in the article from Pelle's [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islam_in_the_United_States&diff=next&oldid=160836662 edit] which says: |
|||
:<b><i>However, a Pew Research Center survey also found that some subgroups of America's Islamic community -- specifically, younger Muslims and African-American Muslims -- are somewhat more likely than the group as a whole to be open to extremism. African-American Muslims also were far more likely to feel alienated from the mainstream culture and suspicious of the government.</b></i> |
|||
:So this was not unverified information. This can be found in the news article. Please explain. --[[User:Matt57|Matt57]] |
|||
:*The source is <b>abpnews.com</b>[http://www.abpnews.com], which is a politically [[Baptist]], religiously opinionated [[rightwing]] news source. Please consult [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Extremist_sources|WP:RS]]. It is probably better to stick to more [[scholarly]] sources. Thanks in advance! <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 04:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:**Ah I see, I didnt notice it was a religious website. Sounds good.--[[User:Matt57|Matt57]] <sup>([[User_talk:Matt57|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Matt57|contribs]])</sup> 15:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*Also you are either H.E or Kirbytime, from your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Harish101&diff=prev&oldid=147637402 first] edit being a template warning to another user. Obviously you're not a new user judging from your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&target=Atari400 earliest] contribs, so what was your previous username? --[[User:Matt57|Matt57]] <sup>([[User_talk:Matt57|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Matt57|contribs]])</sup> 14:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
**'''<i>You got me</i>'''. I am actually a [[Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry|sockpuppet]] of editor [[User:Sefringle|Sefringle]]. I really can't talk about it right now, because I am currently [[undercover]] practicing a form of <b><i>[[taqiyya|reverse taqiyya]]</b></i>. You know how that goes. If brave souls like yourself fail to fight the [[Arab]]/[[Islam]]ic [[horde]]s here on Wikipedia, their next stop will be [[world domination]]. I thank you for the tireless efforts of your heroic, selfless struggle. I know you have given up much in your life for this cause. The world depends on you, and only you can save it, [[User:Matt57|Matt57]]...God speed. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 04:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Please do not delete others' comments == |
|||
{{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Talk:Shia Islam|, as you did at [[:Talk:Shia Islam]],}} is considered [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Behavior that is unacceptable|bad practice]], even if you meant well. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-tpv1 --> --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 16:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*I removed some pointless vandalism. If you feel strongly about it, then just restore it. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 21:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:In that case, I am very confused. Which part of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AShia_Islam&diff=180413772&oldid=177449041 this] do you feel is pointless and/or vandalism? --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 01:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Let me clarify, as I had to review that action. It looks to me like an attempt at using an article's talk page as a forum for religious [[proselytizing]] of one form or another. In effect, using an article discussion page as an outlet for [[Wikipedia:Spam|spamming]]. That is purely a subjective viewpoint and response on my part. You seem to disagree, and I view the matter as a dead horse. I do thank you for taking the time to explain your action, though. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 02:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Edit war on Jewish slave trade == |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand.svg|30px|left|Warning]] |
|||
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{#if:Jewish slave trade|, as you are doing at [[:Jewish slave trade]]}}. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit warring]], even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> [[User:AliveFreeHappy|AliveFreeHappy]] ([[User talk:AliveFreeHappy|talk]]) 10:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==AfD nomination of [[Jewish slave trade]]== |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|48px|left]]An article that you have been involved in editing, [[Jewish slave trade]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish slave trade]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:adw --> --[[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 15:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|Sockpuppetry]] case== |
|||
{| align="left" |
|||
|| [[Image:Puppeter template.svg|50px]] |
|||
|} |
|||
You have been accused of [[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|sockpuppetry]]. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kirbytime]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect|notes for the suspect]] before editing the evidence page.{{do not delete}} [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User_talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 15:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*Yes, I am aware of that, and I am aware of the result. <b><i>[[User:Atari400|Atari400]]</i></b> 15:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Stephen Hawking == |
|||
I was actually trying to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Atari400&diff=180641165&oldid=180640515 reply] to your comment about Hawkings. What do you think about including the information from the pope to [[Stephen Hawkings]]? Its an honest question. --[[User:Matt57|Matt57]] <sup>([[User_talk:Matt57|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/Matt57|contribs]])</sup> 17:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
{{unblock reviewed|1=Blocked editor "Kirbytime" has emailed me, stating that I am not him. I will have that former editor email any Administrator with verification|decline=[[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kirbytime|This]] is explanation enough. [[User:AGK|<font color="#2A8B31">'''Anthøny'''</font>]] 12:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)}} |
|||
Revision as of 05:45, 25 June 2008
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.