Jump to content

User talk:Xp54321: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 76: Line 76:
{{collapse top|Rollback}}
{{collapse top|Rollback}}
Since I can see you posted to Xenocidic's talkpage a couple of minutes before me, I assume you've seen my post there; I've just made the connection between the history of that page and you. There is absolutely no way [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neverwinter_Nights_2%3A_Storm_of_Zehir&diff=225236323&oldid=225236308 this] could be considered a legitimate use of rollback. Please be more careful; whatever you might think of us, nobody wants to take rollback away from you again, but in light of your history consider this a final-final-warning.<font face="Trebuchet MS">&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Iridescent|<font color="#E45E05">iride</font>]][[User_talk:Iridescent|<font color="#C1118C">scent</font>]]</font> 17:54, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Since I can see you posted to Xenocidic's talkpage a couple of minutes before me, I assume you've seen my post there; I've just made the connection between the history of that page and you. There is absolutely no way [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neverwinter_Nights_2%3A_Storm_of_Zehir&diff=225236323&oldid=225236308 this] could be considered a legitimate use of rollback. Please be more careful; whatever you might think of us, nobody wants to take rollback away from you again, but in light of your history consider this a final-final-warning.<font face="Trebuchet MS">&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Iridescent|<font color="#E45E05">iride</font>]][[User_talk:Iridescent|<font color="#C1118C">scent</font>]]</font> 17:54, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
:My suggestion would be to slow down a bit. There's no need to rush whilst using huggle - if you don't get to it, someone else will. When I was using huggle (yes, I used it for a short time), I rarely used the "revert and warn" button unless I was absolutely sure and the vandalism was completely off-the-wall inappropriate. If I was only 95% sure, I would just revert (no warn). If I was less than 90% sure it was vandalism, I'd just let it go (heck, that queue fills up so fast - let someone else review it). Anyways, hope this helps. –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xenocidic|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font><font color="#DCDCDC">cidic</font>]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 18:05, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
{{collapse bottom}}
{{collapse bottom}}

Revision as of 18:05, 12 July 2008

Please click here to leave me a new message.


Question

Question by Vandal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


How the gosh do I add an edit summary? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.105.26.184 (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At the bottom of the edit box you will see a much smaller box titled "edit summary" it is small and long.Use it to summarize your changes or explain what you are doing etc.--Xp54321 (Hello!Contribs) 16:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits are most definitely vandalism..STOP!--Xp54321 (Hello!Contribs) 17:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

CBM

Tags

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hmm why? (The edit trace is pretty clear - one person logging in as three accounts to promote a magazine) Tedickey (talk) 17:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmmh?I was attempting to restore the tags but I removed content so I reverted myself.--Xp54321 (Hello!Contribs) 17:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - it wasn't entirely clear - I'll add back the tags Tedickey (talk) 17:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I'm sure you already know what I'm about to say

Rollback

Since I can see you posted to Xenocidic's talkpage a couple of minutes before me, I assume you've seen my post there; I've just made the connection between the history of that page and you. There is absolutely no way this could be considered a legitimate use of rollback. Please be more careful; whatever you might think of us, nobody wants to take rollback away from you again, but in light of your history consider this a final-final-warning. – iridescent 17:54, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestion would be to slow down a bit. There's no need to rush whilst using huggle - if you don't get to it, someone else will. When I was using huggle (yes, I used it for a short time), I rarely used the "revert and warn" button unless I was absolutely sure and the vandalism was completely off-the-wall inappropriate. If I was only 95% sure, I would just revert (no warn). If I was less than 90% sure it was vandalism, I'd just let it go (heck, that queue fills up so fast - let someone else review it). Anyways, hope this helps. –xenocidic (talk) 18:05, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]