Jump to content

User talk:Wee Curry Monster: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ecemaml (talk | contribs)
→‎I see...: new section
→‎I see...: - Edited to tone
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


... that you've simply removed my messages, therefore, I guess my answers are not welcome. However, don't accuse me of breaking the 3RR. I did it after you did it in the same way and I'll leave for a day. I don't have anything to revert in [[Gibraltar]]. My additions are sourced, are attributed and are relevant so that I've moved then to other places in the article. The consensus discussion didn't consider the UK government position, which is relevant, so that, even so, the consensus has nothing to say in new additions (I mean, there isn't a consensus on not including such an information). And finally, don't forget to presume good faith. You haven't done it. --[[User:Ecemaml|Ecemaml]] ([[User talk:Ecemaml|talk]]) 00:45, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
... that you've simply removed my messages, therefore, I guess my answers are not welcome. However, don't accuse me of breaking the 3RR. I did it after you did it in the same way and I'll leave for a day. I don't have anything to revert in [[Gibraltar]]. My additions are sourced, are attributed and are relevant so that I've moved then to other places in the article. The consensus discussion didn't consider the UK government position, which is relevant, so that, even so, the consensus has nothing to say in new additions (I mean, there isn't a consensus on not including such an information). And finally, don't forget to presume good faith. You haven't done it. --[[User:Ecemaml|Ecemaml]] ([[User talk:Ecemaml|talk]]) 00:45, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

:Just report the man to 3RR, Justin. Some people need a good game of 'whack a mole' with the ban stick before they learn how to play nice with others. Can't say this improves my opinion of the Spanish Wikipedia, though on the flip side, my opinion of it can't get any lower. <span style="font-famiy: verdana;"> --[[User:Narson|<span style="color:#1100;">'''Narson'''</span>]] ~ [[User_talk:Narson|<span style="color:#900;">''Talk''</span>]] • </span> 07:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:53, 27 September 2008

I see...

... that you've simply removed my messages, therefore, I guess my answers are not welcome. However, don't accuse me of breaking the 3RR. I did it after you did it in the same way and I'll leave for a day. I don't have anything to revert in Gibraltar. My additions are sourced, are attributed and are relevant so that I've moved then to other places in the article. The consensus discussion didn't consider the UK government position, which is relevant, so that, even so, the consensus has nothing to say in new additions (I mean, there isn't a consensus on not including such an information). And finally, don't forget to presume good faith. You haven't done it. --Ecemaml (talk) 00:45, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just report the man to 3RR, Justin. Some people need a good game of 'whack a mole' with the ban stick before they learn how to play nice with others. Can't say this improves my opinion of the Spanish Wikipedia, though on the flip side, my opinion of it can't get any lower. --Narson ~ Talk 07:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]