Talk:Base unit of measurement/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Little_guru (talk) No edit summary |
Little_guru (talk) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not sure about the tone of this article. Doesn't this discussion belong under '[[dimensional analysis]]'? -- [[The Anome]] |
'''I'm not sure about the tone of this article. Doesn't this discussion belong under '[[dimensional analysis]]'? -- [[The Anome]]''' |
||
Hmm, nah, i've added this new page as a link to the [[physics]] page under the "Concepts" paragraph. |
''Hmm, nah, i've added this new page as a link to the [[physics]] page under the "Concepts" paragraph. |
||
[[Little_guru]] |
[[Little_guru]]'' |
||
Revision as of 12:51, 8 December 2001
I'm not sure about the tone of this article. Doesn't this discussion belong under 'dimensional analysis'? -- The Anome
Hmm, nah, i've added this new page as a link to the physics page under the "Concepts" paragraph.
And whilst we're at it, what about geometric algebra? (See http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/~clifford/introduction/intro/intro.html for a discussion). -- The Anome
I worked as a computer science technician in 2 different Electrotechnical labs, and I can assure you that imaginary numbers exist in the calculus of alternate currents.
Is this what you were aiming to talk about?