Jump to content

Talk:Base unit of measurement/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Koyaanis Qatsi (talk | contribs)
removing obsolete discussion
Little_guru (talk)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
There was some other talk at [[/talk]] . All discussion of the page should be on THIS page, not comments or forum or anything of the sort.
There was some other talk at [[/talk]] . All discussion of the page should be on THIS page, not comments or forum or anything of the sort.




I have rewritten this page from scratch, because it was flatly idiotic before. Now it is merely lame. --[[Jimbo Wales]]
I have rewritten this page from scratch, because it was flatly idiotic before. Now it is merely lame. --[[Jimbo Wales]]



---

------




<h1>Importance in understanding Fundamental Dimensions</h1>
<h1>Importance in understanding Fundamental Dimensions</h1>




It's important to focus on the Fundamental Dimensions used in [[physics]], so we can understand at any given point of any given physics discussion what we are talking about.
It's important to focus on the Fundamental Dimensions used in [[physics]], so we can understand at any given point of any given physics discussion what we are talking about.




Infact, if you add 2 apples to 2 apples you get 4 apples. But if you add 2 apples to 3 oranges... what do you get? Yes, you get 5 fruits, but you will loose the particular aspect of the apple and of the orange that you started with. So let's focus on the fact that usually we deal with 4 fundamental dimensions or units in:
Infact, if you add 2 apples to 2 apples you get 4 apples. But if you add 2 apples to 3 oranges... what do you get? Yes, you get 5 fruits, but you will loose the particular aspect of the apple and of the orange that you started with. So let's focus on the fact that usually we deal with 4 fundamental dimensions or units in:







# [[Length]] measure
# [[Length]] measure

# [[Time]] measure
# [[Time]] measure

# [[Mass]] measure
# [[Mass]] measure

# [[Electric]] charge measure
# [[Electric]] charge measure




... and that we CAN NOT obviously add a Time measurement (say 5 seconds) to a Length measurement (say 1 mile) because it makes ABSOLUTELY NO sense.
... and that we CAN NOT obviously add a Time measurement (say 5 seconds) to a Length measurement (say 1 mile) because it makes ABSOLUTELY NO sense.




'''(1 sec + 1 mile = ???)'''
'''(1 sec + 1 mile = ???)'''




From these 4 dimensions we can talk about the 80% of ALL physics problems existing now or in the future... (Future?? Who knows the [[future]]?)
From these 4 dimensions we can talk about the 80% of ALL physics problems existing now or in the future... (Future?? Who knows the [[future]]?)




If you want to talk of the other 20% you need to add other 3 dimensions
If you want to talk of the other 20% you need to add other 3 dimensions







# Thermodynamic temperature measure
# Thermodynamic temperature measure

# Amount of substance measure
# Amount of substance measure

# Luminous intensity measure
# Luminous intensity measure




Once we agreed on so... How would you measure ESP ([Extra Sensorial Perceptions]?)? (LOL) :) (So we can talk about 101 % of physics now, say [[metaphysics]])
Once we agreed on so... How would you measure ESP ([Extra Sensorial Perceptions]?)? (LOL) :) (So we can talk about 101 % of physics now, say [[metaphysics]])




[[little guru]]
[[little guru]]







------
------




Thanx Jimbo, for letting me appear less idiotic.
Thanx Jimbo, for letting me appear less idiotic.




Very obliged.
Very obliged.




*:)
*:)




[[little guru]]
[[little guru]]




Revision as of 23:18, 8 December 2001

There was some other talk at /talk . All discussion of the page should be on THIS page, not comments or forum or anything of the sort.


I have rewritten this page from scratch, because it was flatly idiotic before. Now it is merely lame. --Jimbo Wales




Importance in understanding Fundamental Dimensions


It's important to focus on the Fundamental Dimensions used in physics, so we can understand at any given point of any given physics discussion what we are talking about.


Infact, if you add 2 apples to 2 apples you get 4 apples. But if you add 2 apples to 3 oranges... what do you get? Yes, you get 5 fruits, but you will loose the particular aspect of the apple and of the orange that you started with. So let's focus on the fact that usually we deal with 4 fundamental dimensions or units in:



  1. Length measure
  1. Time measure
  1. Mass measure
  1. Electric charge measure


... and that we CAN NOT obviously add a Time measurement (say 5 seconds) to a Length measurement (say 1 mile) because it makes ABSOLUTELY NO sense.


(1 sec + 1 mile = ???)


From these 4 dimensions we can talk about the 80% of ALL physics problems existing now or in the future... (Future?? Who knows the future?)


If you want to talk of the other 20% you need to add other 3 dimensions



  1. Thermodynamic temperature measure
  1. Amount of substance measure
  1. Luminous intensity measure


Once we agreed on so... How would you measure ESP ([Extra Sensorial Perceptions]?)? (LOL) :) (So we can talk about 101 % of physics now, say metaphysics)


little guru





Thanx Jimbo, for letting me appear less idiotic.


Very obliged.


  • )


little guru