Jump to content

User talk:Jackiestud: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created page with '{{subst:W-graphical}} ~~~~'
 
Line 56: Line 56:
|}
|}
[[User:Yowuza|Yowuza]] <small> [[User talk:Yowuza|Talk 2 me!]] </small> 13:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
[[User:Yowuza|Yowuza]] <small> [[User talk:Yowuza|Talk 2 me!]] </small> 13:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

== Talk:Jodie Foster ==

Please be aware, as I made blatantly clear on the talk page, that your posting is a violation of the Wikipedia policy covering [[WP:BLP|biographies of living people]]. Your comments that attack her beliefs regarding God, or the lack thereof, are '''not''' commentary regarding specific improvements to the article. Statements that include "I am sorry for her agonising ignorance" and "I am sorry for JF´s enourmous ignorance" absolutely have ''no'' place on the Wikipedia talk page for Foster's article. This is not a forum for your opinions, there is nothing allowable in Wikipedia policy that allows you post this attack. I removed the statement saying this was not a forum. You returned it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jodie_Foster&diff=260707600&oldid=260706305 here], saying "But it´s my commnet concernig the article..." This comment does ''not'' concern improvements to the article, it is your comment regarding Foster herself. You were told this explicitly when I made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jodie_Foster&diff=260712832&oldid=260709649 this post]. I gave it some time for you to reply to my objection and then I removed it as a blatant [[WP:BLP]] violation [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jodie_Foster&diff=262462005&oldid=262457409 here]. You returned ''only part'' of the discussion, conveniently omitting my [[WP:BLP]] objection less than 8 hours later, stating "Can you respect third opinion?" This is not a matter of removing a third opinion. This is removing an attack upon Foster. This is '''not''' appropriate content and has been reported to [[WP:BLP/N]] as a violation. To restate what you did not return to the page:
:This is an inappropriate venue for this comment, which has nothing to do with making or proposing improvements to this article. This is not a forum for discussing someone's opinion of an article subject's life, beliefs, or actions. To reiterate the lead paragraph of [[WP:TALK]]: ''The purpose of a Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk page]] is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page. '''Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views.''''' To make matters worse, this attacks her with language such as "agonising ignorance" and "enourmous ingorance". If you want to discuss your issues with her personal beliefs, I suggest you find a Jodie Foster forum in a venue that doesn't have restrictions on the use of the page. [[User:Wildhartlivie|Wildhartlivie]] ([[User talk:Wildhartlivie|talk]]) 16:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:03, 8 January 2009

Hello Jackiestud, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Yowuza Talk 2 me! 13:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help
Yowuza  Talk 2 me!  13:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Jodie Foster

Please be aware, as I made blatantly clear on the talk page, that your posting is a violation of the Wikipedia policy covering biographies of living people. Your comments that attack her beliefs regarding God, or the lack thereof, are not commentary regarding specific improvements to the article. Statements that include "I am sorry for her agonising ignorance" and "I am sorry for JF´s enourmous ignorance" absolutely have no place on the Wikipedia talk page for Foster's article. This is not a forum for your opinions, there is nothing allowable in Wikipedia policy that allows you post this attack. I removed the statement saying this was not a forum. You returned it here, saying "But it´s my commnet concernig the article..." This comment does not concern improvements to the article, it is your comment regarding Foster herself. You were told this explicitly when I made this post. I gave it some time for you to reply to my objection and then I removed it as a blatant WP:BLP violation here. You returned only part of the discussion, conveniently omitting my WP:BLP objection less than 8 hours later, stating "Can you respect third opinion?" This is not a matter of removing a third opinion. This is removing an attack upon Foster. This is not appropriate content and has been reported to WP:BLP/N as a violation. To restate what you did not return to the page:

This is an inappropriate venue for this comment, which has nothing to do with making or proposing improvements to this article. This is not a forum for discussing someone's opinion of an article subject's life, beliefs, or actions. To reiterate the lead paragraph of WP:TALK: The purpose of a Wikipedia talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views. To make matters worse, this attacks her with language such as "agonising ignorance" and "enourmous ingorance". If you want to discuss your issues with her personal beliefs, I suggest you find a Jodie Foster forum in a venue that doesn't have restrictions on the use of the page. Wildhartlivie (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]