Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriella Fox: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:41, 1 February 2009

Gabriella Fox

~~No reliable sources. No assertion of notability. Fails WP:PORNBIO, a bit part in Pirates II doesn't hack it.~~ David in DC (talk) 23:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Although the article needs cleaning up, it now has the reliable sources and verifiable assertions of notability it once lacked. Unless anyone disagrees, I would be happy to see this AfD closed with the notation Article Rescued by Epbr123 and Hoang.pham19. David in DC (talk) 01:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —David in DC (talk) 23:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. David in DC (talk) 00:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. twirligig^{Leave one! ⋄ Check me out!} 03:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ per nom. Dismas|^(talk) 20:48, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Epbr123. Dismas|^(talk) 02:26, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a stub for this up and coming actressEsasus (talk) 21:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Just a note that the "up and coming actress" is already retired. Heh. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:47, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:PORNBIO per award nom. Has also had coverage here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Epbr123 (talk) 01:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 :{{la|Gabriella Fox}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Gabriella Fox|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriella Fox]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriella Fox|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 January 27#{{anchorencode:Gabriella Fox}}|View log]])</noinclude>
-No [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. No assertion of [[WP:N|notability]]. Fails [[WP:PORNBIO]], a bit part in ''Pirates II'' doesn't hack it. [[User:David in DC|David in DC]] ([[User talk:David in DC|talk]]) 23:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
+<s>No [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. No assertion of [[WP:N|notability]]. Fails [[WP:PORNBIO]], a bit part in ''Pirates II'' doesn't hack it.</s> [[User:David in DC|David in DC]] ([[User talk:David in DC|talk]]) 23:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
+Although the article needs cleaning up, it now has the [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and verifiable assertions of [[WP:N|notability]] it once lacked. Unless anyone disagrees, I would be happy to see this AfD closed with the notation '''Article Rescued by [[User:Epbr123|Epbr123]] and [[User:Hoang.pham19|Hoang.pham19]]'''. [[User:David in DC|David in DC]] ([[User talk:David in DC|talk]]) 01:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 *<small>'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Living people|list of Living people-related deletion discussions]].  </small><small>—[[User:David in DC|David in DC]] ([[User talk:David in DC|talk]]) 23:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)</small>
 * <span style="font-size: 85%;">Note: This debate has been added to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography|WikiProject Pornography]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Deletion|list of deletions]]. [[User:David in DC|David in DC]] ([[User talk:David in DC|talk]]) 00:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)</span>