Open content: Difference between revisions
Larry Sanger (talk | contribs) Adding reference to interesting paper |
Larry_Sanger (talk) Adding reference to interesting paper |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Open content,''' coined by analogy with ''[[open source]],'' describes any kind of creative work (for example, articles, pictures, audio, video, etc.) that is published under a non-restrictive copyright license and format that explicitly allows the copying of the information. (An example is the [[GNU Free Documentation License]], which is used by [[Wikipedia]] and [[Nupedia]].) But "open content" also describes content that can be modified by anyone. Of course, this is not without prior review by other participating parties--but there is no closed group like a commercial encyclopedia publisher which is responsible for all the editing. |
'''Open content,''' coined by analogy with ''[[open source]],'' describes any kind of creative work (for example, articles, pictures, audio, video, etc.) that is published under a non-restrictive copyright license and format that explicitly allows the copying of the information. (An example is the [[GNU Free Documentation License]], which is used by [[Wikipedia]] and [[Nupedia]].) But "open content" also describes content that can be modified by anyone. Of course, this is not without prior review by other participating parties--but there is no closed group like a commercial encyclopedia publisher which is responsible for all the editing. |
||
Just as open source software is sometimes described simply as [[free software]], open content materials can be more briefly described as free materials. See [[free software movement]]. |
Just as open source software is sometimes described simply as [[free software]], open content materials can be more briefly described as free materials. See [[free software movement]]. |
||
Links: |
Links: |
||
* [http://jan.netcomp.monash.edu.au/opendoc/paper.html Jan Newmarch, "Open Content Licenses," jan. |
* [http://jan.netcomp.monash.edu.au/opendoc/paper.html Jan Newmarch, "Open Content Licenses," http://jan.netcomp.monash.edu.au] |
||
/Talk |
/Talk |
||
Revision as of 00:47, 20 September 2001
Open content, coined by analogy with open source, describes any kind of creative work (for example, articles, pictures, audio, video, etc.) that is published under a non-restrictive copyright license and format that explicitly allows the copying of the information. (An example is the GNU Free Documentation License, which is used by Wikipedia and Nupedia.) But "open content" also describes content that can be modified by anyone. Of course, this is not without prior review by other participating parties--but there is no closed group like a commercial encyclopedia publisher which is responsible for all the editing.
Just as open source software is sometimes described simply as free software, open content materials can be more briefly described as free materials. See free software movement.
Links:
/Talk