Talk:Philosophy of perception: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:52, 3 January 2002

I'm not sure that the last two paragraphs should go here. Perhaps on cognition or philosophy of mind, or better yet, on a page about autopoiesis. I'm really not sure, because I don't know anything about this; this is the first I've heard of Maturana and Varela, probably because they aren't (weren't) philosophers but scientists, and the theory is not well known by philosophers generally. --LMS

Revision as of 23:51, 3 January 2002 edit Larry_Sanger (talk) No edit summary		Revision as of 23:52, 3 January 2002 edit undo Larry_Sanger (talk) mNo edit summary Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'm not sure that the last two paragraphs should go here. Perhaps on [[cognition]] or [[philosophy of mind]], or better yet, on a page about [[~~autopoesis~~]]. I'm really not sure, because I don't know anything about this; this is the first I've heard of Maturana and Varela, probably because they aren't (weren't) philosophers but scientists, and the theory is not well known by philosophers generally. --[[LMS]]		I'm not sure that the last two paragraphs should go here. Perhaps on [[cognition]] or [[philosophy of mind]], or better yet, on a page about [[autopoiesis]]. I'm really not sure, because I don't know anything about this; this is the first I've heard of Maturana and Varela, probably because they aren't (weren't) philosophers but scientists, and the theory is not well known by philosophers generally. --[[LMS]]