Jump to content

Symbolic Logic: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Simon_J_Kissane (talk)
No edit summary
Simon_J_Kissane (talk)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:


* relevant -- has only relevant implication
* relevant -- has only relevant implication

* substructural -- systems of logic weaker than classical logic





Revision as of 05:35, 24 July 2001

Symbolic logic is divided into propositional calculus, predicate calculus and modal logics.


Propositional caluclus deals with the logic of individual sentences. There are a number of different systems of propositional calculus:

  • classical -- the normal traditional system
  • many-valued -- permits sentences to be more than just true or false, but also have intermediate truth values
  • paraconsistent -- permits inconsistent sentences. Does not have ex contradictione quodlibet (from a contradiction anything follows)
  • infinitary -- permits sentences to be infinitely long
  • intuitionistic --
  • relevant -- has only relevant implication
  • substructural -- systems of logic weaker than classical logic


Predicate calculus deals with the logic of predication and quantification. Systems include:

  • lower-order --
  • higher-order -- permits quantification and predication of predicates


Modal logic -- also deontic logic, temporal logic:

  • various systems: B, T, S4, S5