Wikipedia:Historical archive/Policy/Summary of the debate about the neutral point of view: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Larry_Sanger (talk) No edit summary |
Larry_Sanger (talk) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In the interests of summing the debate up (so we don't keep running over the same issues over and over again), let's together develop a concise summary of the arguments that have been raised for against the Wikipedia policy that we follow the [[neutral point of view]]. |
In the interests of summing the debate up (so we don't keep running over the same issues over and over again), let's together develop a concise summary of the arguments that have been raised for and against the Wikipedia policy that we follow the [[neutral point of view]]. |
||
---- |
---- |
||
Revision as of 23:04, 19 October 2001
In the interests of summing the debate up (so we don't keep running over the same issues over and over again), let's together develop a concise summary of the arguments that have been raised for and against the Wikipedia policy that we follow the neutral point of view.
I would be only too happy to reply to help develop a draft and to develop replies. I am firmly persuaded that very many objections to a nonbias policy stem from a failure to understand it properly. Something similar to what was done on Wikipedia subpages pros and cons page would be really great. --Larry Sanger