Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TGT (group): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
JamesBurns (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
A-Kartoffel (talk | contribs) d |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<hr style="width:50%;"/> |
<hr style="width:50%;"/> |
||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]''' | [[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 00:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]''' | [[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 00:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
||
*'''Delete''', no reliable coverage. [[User:A-Kartoffel|A-Kartoffel]] ([[User talk:A-Kartoffel|talk]]) 18:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
* Despite the group not having released an album, they received a fair amount of media coverage, including entire articles about the trio in the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', the ''[[Los Angeles Sentinel]]'', and ''[[Jet (magazine)|Jet]]''. I've added six references just now. The article's subject meets the [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]], or [[WP:BAND]] criterion #1, so I suggest '''keep'''. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 19:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC) |
* Despite the group not having released an album, they received a fair amount of media coverage, including entire articles about the trio in the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', the ''[[Los Angeles Sentinel]]'', and ''[[Jet (magazine)|Jet]]''. I've added six references just now. The article's subject meets the [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]], or [[WP:BAND]] criterion #1, so I suggest '''keep'''. <font face="Comic sans MS">[[User:Paul Erik|Paul Erik]]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">[[User_talk:Paul Erik|(talk)]]</font><font color="Green">[[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|(contribs)]]</font></sup></small> 19:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
**That's a little better, but are any of those sources [[WP:V|verifiable]]? I mean, they ''do'' all claim to come from magazines and newspapers that are years old and whose issues don't appear to be accessible via the internet. '''[[User:COMPFUNK2|THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL]]''' 01:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC) |
**That's a little better, but are any of those sources [[WP:V|verifiable]]? I mean, they ''do'' all claim to come from magazines and newspapers that are years old and whose issues don't appear to be accessible via the internet. '''[[User:COMPFUNK2|THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL]]''' 01:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 09:44, 14 April 2009
- TGT (group) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This group does not have any independent notability, and their album was never released. Normally I would merge it instead, but I wouldn't know whether to merge it to the Ginuwine, Tank or Tyrese article. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 19:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 08:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, no reliable coverage. A-Kartoffel (talk) 18:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Despite the group not having released an album, they received a fair amount of media coverage, including entire articles about the trio in the Los Angeles Times, the Los Angeles Sentinel, and Jet. I've added six references just now. The article's subject meets the general notability guideline, or WP:BAND criterion #1, so I suggest keep. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 19:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- That's a little better, but are any of those sources verifiable? I mean, they do all claim to come from magazines and newspapers that are years old and whose issues don't appear to be accessible via the internet. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 01:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- They're not available via the Internet. To "verify" them, one might have to resort to other means. :) Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 01:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- ...Which once again points to WP:V. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 04:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- I might be missing your point...? Sources do not have to be on the Internet to be considered appropriate reliable sources according to WP:V. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- It would certainly help though. JamesBurns (talk) 05:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- I might be missing your point...? Sources do not have to be on the Internet to be considered appropriate reliable sources according to WP:V. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- ...Which once again points to WP:V. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 04:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- They're not available via the Internet. To "verify" them, one might have to resort to other means. :) Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 01:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- That's a little better, but are any of those sources verifiable? I mean, they do all claim to come from magazines and newspapers that are years old and whose issues don't appear to be accessible via the internet. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 01:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)