TheoremProving: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Josh Grosse (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
rossby.maths.keele.ac.uk (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
There are |
There are many ways of proving a theorem correct, including: |
||
* Contradiction - |
* [[reductio ad absurdum|Contradiction]] - If we can show that the assumption that our hypothesis is false leads to a logical contradiction, it follows that the hypothesis must be true. Also known as [[reductio ad absurdum]]. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
* ? |
|||
Revision as of 18:31, 12 March 2001
A mathematical theorem begins with a mathematical hypothesis, proceeds through mathematical reasoning to reach a mathematical conclusion.
Mathematicians seek to establish chains of reasoning that are convincing to other mathematicians. The main differences between mathematical argument and ordinary logical argument are in the topics of mathematical discourse.
The following diagram displays the relations among the terms:
- Theorem = Hypothesis--->Proof--->Conclusion
There are many ways of proving a theorem correct, including:
- Contradiction - If we can show that the assumption that our hypothesis is false leads to a logical contradiction, it follows that the hypothesis must be true. Also known as reductio ad absurdum.
By mathematical hypothesis, are we meaning the result to be proven or axioms?