Talk:Status of Gibraltar: Difference between revisions
Talk:Disputed status of Gibraltar moved to Talk:Disputed status of Gibraltar/1: Archiving |
m Attemping to settle down |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Disagreements== |
|||
#REDIRECT [[Talk:Disputed status of Gibraltar/1]] |
|||
It's being difficult to reach an agreement with regard to the dispute in [[Disputed status of Gibraltar]] and [[History of Gibraltar]]. I've been today in the Spanish National Library (a dark place full of francoist librarians that secretly conspire against the freedom of the Gibraltar people ;-)) and I've got some sources that, if necessary, could be scanned and uploaded to illustrate the discussion. |
|||
As there is a lot of disagreements, I propose the next method: beginning with [[History of Gibraltar]]. It shows facts so that it should be possible to get reliable sources to describe the facts and the different interpretations of a given topic. Once settled down, we can pass to [[Disputed status of Gibraltar]]. |
|||
With regard to [[History of Gibraltar]], my proposal is as follows: given that "my" version (it can be seen in [[History of Gibraltar/temp]]) is much more longer than the current one, I'll show the points that I've removed from the current version and explain why (providing sources if necessary and available). Once agreed, we can pass to examine all my additions and a similar process (asking for sources if not clear or not agreed) will be implemented. Hopefully, it would take much more time. Unfortunatelly, I don't think that [[Disputed status of Gibraltar]] will be that easy, but fixing [[History of Gibraltar]] would be a success, wouldn't it? --[[User:Ecemaml|Ecemaml]] 20:05, 23 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:05, 23 November 2005
Disagreements
It's being difficult to reach an agreement with regard to the dispute in Disputed status of Gibraltar and History of Gibraltar. I've been today in the Spanish National Library (a dark place full of francoist librarians that secretly conspire against the freedom of the Gibraltar people ;-)) and I've got some sources that, if necessary, could be scanned and uploaded to illustrate the discussion.
As there is a lot of disagreements, I propose the next method: beginning with History of Gibraltar. It shows facts so that it should be possible to get reliable sources to describe the facts and the different interpretations of a given topic. Once settled down, we can pass to Disputed status of Gibraltar.
With regard to History of Gibraltar, my proposal is as follows: given that "my" version (it can be seen in History of Gibraltar/temp) is much more longer than the current one, I'll show the points that I've removed from the current version and explain why (providing sources if necessary and available). Once agreed, we can pass to examine all my additions and a similar process (asking for sources if not clear or not agreed) will be implemented. Hopefully, it would take much more time. Unfortunatelly, I don't think that Disputed status of Gibraltar will be that easy, but fixing History of Gibraltar would be a success, wouldn't it? --Ecemaml 20:05, 23 November 2005 (UTC)