Wikipedia talk:History standards: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
Larry_Sanger (talk) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Why is the genera bit here? Surely all the Kings and Queens are Homo sapiens? :D [[Dave McKee]] |
Why is the genera bit here? Surely all the Kings and Queens are Homo sapiens? :D [[Dave McKee]] |
||
---- |
|||
To all these rules: who says? Wouldn't it be better to model this page after [[rules to consider]]? --[[LMS]] |
|||
Revision as of 00:40, 27 October 2001
Maybe for nicknames, we should just automatically create a page for the nickname and redirect to the number? e.g., Philip the Fair (redirect to Philip IV of France)...JHK
What's wrong with using italics for genera and species? It's a standard I've seen elsewhere. --corvus13
Why is the genera bit here? Surely all the Kings and Queens are Homo sapiens? :D Dave McKee
To all these rules: who says? Wouldn't it be better to model this page after rules to consider? --LMS