Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dillonmcallaway: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created case.
 
mNo edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Explicit|Explicit]] </span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Explicit|Explicit]] </span>======
Oh, this is just [[WP:DUCK|far too obvious]]. ChelseaChoice was created as a result of the several discussions initiated by Dillonmcallaway after his dislike of the [[:File:The Monster Ball - Poker Face revamped2-tweak.jpg|current image of Lady Gaga]], and editors were against the use [[:File:462px-The Monster Ball - Poker Face revamped2 cropped lightadjustandglow.jpg|his version]]. ChelseaChoice's first edit was to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lady_Gaga&diff=388960154&oldid=388959470 support] the use of Dillonmcallaway's version. ChelseaChoice's [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_Lennon&diff=prev&oldid=388960413 second edit] deals with the image in [[John Lennon]]'s article. Unsurprisingly, Dillonmcallaway shows the same "concerns" over at [[Talk:Britney Spears#change the main picture]]. — [[User:Explicit|<font color="008080">'''ξ'''</font>]][[User talk:Explicit|<font color="000000"><sup>xplicit</sup></font>]] 21:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Oh, this is just [[WP:DUCK|far too obvious]]. ChelseaChoice was created as a result of the several discussions initiated by Dillonmcallaway after his dislike of the [[:File:The Monster Ball - Poker Face revamped2-tweak.jpg|current image of Lady Gaga]], and editors were against the use [[:File:462px-The Monster Ball - Poker Face revamped2 cropped lightadjustandglow.jpg|his version]]. ChelseaChoice's first edit was to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lady_Gaga&diff=388960154&oldid=388959470 support] the use of Dillonmcallaway's version. ChelseaChoice's [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_Lennon&diff=prev&oldid=388960413 second edit] deals with the image in [[John Lennon]]'s article. Unsurprisingly, Dillonmcallaway shows the same "concerns" over at [[Talk:Britney Spears#change the main picture]]. — [[User:Explicit|<font color="008080">'''ξ'''</font>]][[User talk:Explicit|<font color="000000"><sup>xplicit</sup></font>]] 21:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties &nbsp;&nbsp; </span>======
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small>


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>======


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>======

----
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

{{SPI case status}}


=====<big>05 October 2010</big>=====

{{SPIcat}}

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Suspected sockpuppets </span>======

* {{checkuser|1=ChelseaChoice}}


<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Chasewc91|Chasewc91]] </span>======
[[User:Dillonmcallaway]] has been arguing for the main infobox image at [[Lady Gaga]] to be changed for quite awhile now at the article's [[Talk:Lady Gaga|talk page]]. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ALady_Gaga&action=historysubmit&diff=388958514&oldid=388957911 Here], at 20:40, 5 October 2010, Dillon writes, "I would personally like to see opinions of other editors before making a decision, instead of the same editors that differ with me thread after thread." At 20:46, [[User:ChelseaChoice]] registers, and at 20:49, she [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lady_Gaga&diff=prev&oldid=388960154 leaves] a comment in favor of Dillon's proposal to change the Lady Gaga main image.

I don't think checkuser is necessary - this is a rather obvious sock. –'''''[[User:Chasewc91|<font color="blue">Chase</font>]]''''' ([[User talk:Chasewc91|<font color="blue">talk]]</font>) 21:07, 5 October 2010 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties &nbsp;&nbsp; </span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties &nbsp;&nbsp; </span>======

Revision as of 21:07, 5 October 2010

– This SPI case is open.

Dillonmcallaway

Dillonmcallaway (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
05 October 2010
Suspected sockpuppets



Evidence submitted by Explicit

Oh, this is just far too obvious. ChelseaChoice was created as a result of the several discussions initiated by Dillonmcallaway after his dislike of the current image of Lady Gaga, and editors were against the use his version. ChelseaChoice's first edit was to support the use of Dillonmcallaway's version. ChelseaChoice's second edit deals with the image in John Lennon's article. Unsurprisingly, Dillonmcallaway shows the same "concerns" over at Talk:Britney Spears#change the main picture. — ξxplicit 21:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

– This SPI case is open.


05 October 2010
Suspected sockpuppets



Evidence submitted by Chasewc91

User:Dillonmcallaway has been arguing for the main infobox image at Lady Gaga to be changed for quite awhile now at the article's talk page. Here, at 20:40, 5 October 2010, Dillon writes, "I would personally like to see opinions of other editors before making a decision, instead of the same editors that differ with me thread after thread." At 20:46, User:ChelseaChoice registers, and at 20:49, she leaves a comment in favor of Dillon's proposal to change the Lady Gaga main image.

I don't think checkuser is necessary - this is a rather obvious sock. –Chase (talk) 21:07, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments