User talk:Rangoon11/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
Carcharoth (talk | contribs) →Correct attribution when spinning out new articles: new section |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
: How very childish. [[User:Rangoon11|Rangoon11]] ([[User talk:Rangoon11#top|talk]]) 17:45, 29 November 2010 (UTC) |
: How very childish. [[User:Rangoon11|Rangoon11]] ([[User talk:Rangoon11#top|talk]]) 17:45, 29 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Correct attribution when spinning out new articles == |
|||
Hi Rangoon11. Hope you don't mind a bit of advice on how to attribute the previous edit history when moving text between articles. I'm referring to the two edits you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_people_who_have_turned_on_the_Oxford_Street_Christmas_lights&diff=prev&oldid=399233751 here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oxford_Street&diff=399234601&oldid=399229554 here]. What you need to do is mention in the edit summary the old and new articles. This helps ensure correct attribution is possible. See [[WP:SPLIT]] for more on this, particularly the [[Wikipedia:SPLIT#Procedure|procedure]] section. Please ask me if you have any questions about this. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 00:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:00, 3 December 2010
Nomination of List of people who have turned on the Oxford Street Christmas lights for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article List of people who have turned on the Oxford Street Christmas lights, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who have turned on the Oxford Street Christmas lights until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. mhking (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you make disruptive edits and harm Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Telecommunications industry in the United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 2.120.88.81 (talk) 17:37, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- How very childish. Rangoon11 (talk) 17:45, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Correct attribution when spinning out new articles
Hi Rangoon11. Hope you don't mind a bit of advice on how to attribute the previous edit history when moving text between articles. I'm referring to the two edits you did here and here. What you need to do is mention in the edit summary the old and new articles. This helps ensure correct attribution is possible. See WP:SPLIT for more on this, particularly the procedure section. Please ask me if you have any questions about this. Carcharoth (talk) 00:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC)