Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert V. Gentry: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*'''Keep''' seems notable enough, if it needs attention put <nowiki>{{attention}}</nowiki> on it -- [[User:Astrokey44|Astrokey44]]<small>|[[User talk:Astrokey44|talk]]</small> 12:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' seems notable enough, if it needs attention put <nowiki>{{attention}}</nowiki> on it -- [[User:Astrokey44|Astrokey44]]<small>|[[User talk:Astrokey44|talk]]</small> 12:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' looks notable enough. --[[User:Terence Ong|Ter]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e]]</font>[[User:Terence Ong|nc]][[User talk:Terence Ong|e Ong]] 16:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' looks notable enough. --[[User:Terence Ong|Ter]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e]]</font>[[User:Terence Ong|nc]][[User talk:Terence Ong|e Ong]] 16:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Cmon, some totally unnotable, shit-disturbing, creationist whacko who hardly deserves encyclopedic treatment. [[User:Eusebeus|Eusebeus]] 17:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:35, 13 March 2006
The article states the person is a creationist, advocates his ideas and invented his own cosmology. Good enough, but it should be deleted unless it's shown that someone has paid attention to this. (Prod reverted.) Conscious 10:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep for now [1] [2] He has a book ISBN 0-9616753-2-2 that appears to be self published (at least Earth Science Associates seems to be associated with Orion Foundation. His press release on the lawsuit. He also gets hits from scientific journals. kotepho 11:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep seems notable enough, if it needs attention put {{attention}} on it -- Astrokey44|talk 12:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep looks notable enough. --Terence Ong 16:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Cmon, some totally unnotable, shit-disturbing, creationist whacko who hardly deserves encyclopedic treatment. Eusebeus 17:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)