User talk:Aucaman: Difference between revisions
m Oops |
reply |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
I will see if I can help later, but I am watching it now. --[[user:Anonymous editor|<font color="green">'''a.n.o.n.y.m'''</font>]] <sup>[[user talk:Anonymous editor| ''t'']]</sup> 01:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC) |
I will see if I can help later, but I am watching it now. --[[user:Anonymous editor|<font color="green">'''a.n.o.n.y.m'''</font>]] <sup>[[user talk:Anonymous editor| ''t'']]</sup> 01:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Re: your note on my page == |
|||
Another admin beat me to giving that editor his final warning. If he bothers you again, I will block him. Having read the RfC filed in regards to your conduct, I can see that you're not entirely blameless here.... But that does not mean it is excusable for anyone else to violate policy and harass you. The issues you have chosen to edit are controversial ones, and there is nothing wrong with that. You (and everyone else) should be free to edit whatever they choose, without fear of harassment or even incivility from others. I would only recommend that you make sure to keep a cool head, and do not violate [[WP:CIVIL]] or [[WP:NPA]] (or, of course, any other policies) yourself, or you too will end up blocked. Right now, this case has gotten the attention of a small handful of administrators who are currently willing to defend you from the incivility of other editors. We will be disappointed if you do not respect the policies you wish us to uphold in judging the conduct of others. This is not a warning or an accusation, so please do not take it as such. If anything, it is a hope that cool heads and good, collaborative editing will prevail. Please let me know if there are any further issues. [[User:JDoorjam|JDoorj]][[User:JDoorjam/Esperanza|<font color="green">a</font>]][[User:JDoorjam|m]] [[User Talk:JDoorjam|Talk]] 04:15, 17 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:15, 17 March 2006
This page is yours. Feel free to say whatever you want. Constructive feedbacks would be more than appreciated. --Aucaman 12:21, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
| Server time (UTC) 22:09 Friday 14-June-2024 |
 Archives |
|---|
What do you have to say for yourself?
I see you archived your page! are you embarassed? What do you have to say for your comments regarding Cyrus? --Kash 23:58, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Re:Persian peoples
I will see if I can help later, but I am watching it now. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 01:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Re: your note on my page
Another admin beat me to giving that editor his final warning. If he bothers you again, I will block him. Having read the RfC filed in regards to your conduct, I can see that you're not entirely blameless here.... But that does not mean it is excusable for anyone else to violate policy and harass you. The issues you have chosen to edit are controversial ones, and there is nothing wrong with that. You (and everyone else) should be free to edit whatever they choose, without fear of harassment or even incivility from others. I would only recommend that you make sure to keep a cool head, and do not violate WP:CIVIL or WP:NPA (or, of course, any other policies) yourself, or you too will end up blocked. Right now, this case has gotten the attention of a small handful of administrators who are currently willing to defend you from the incivility of other editors. We will be disappointed if you do not respect the policies you wish us to uphold in judging the conduct of others. This is not a warning or an accusation, so please do not take it as such. If anything, it is a hope that cool heads and good, collaborative editing will prevail. Please let me know if there are any further issues. JDoorjam Talk 04:15, 17 March 2006 (UTC)