Talk:Mumia Abu-Jamal: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Automated conversion |
Larry Sanger (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think there's some information worth looking at on the [http://www.amnesty-usa.org/abolish/reports/mumia/ Amnesty International] site. But I am a dyed in the wool commie pinko crazy longhair. ;-) --KQ |
I think there's some information worth looking at on the [http://www.amnesty-usa.org/abolish/reports/mumia/ Amnesty International] site. But I am a dyed in the wool commie pinko crazy longhair. ;-) --KQ |
||
---- |
|||
This is a perfect example of an article that (1) people will love to fight about, (2) people will want to be biased, but (3) we can make unbiased. The article as it stands is clearly biased in favor of the view that Mumia is innocent (or guilt is unproven). For shame. --[[user:Larry_Sanger|Larry_Sanger]] |
|||
Revision as of 15:51, 25 February 2002
Acording to forensic evidence at the trial both Abu Jamal and Faulkner were shot with .45 calibre bullets. But the prosecution claimed the murder weapon was Abu Jamal's .38 calibre gun. (Faulkner also carried a .38).
I think there's some information worth looking at on the Amnesty International site. But I am a dyed in the wool commie pinko crazy longhair. ;-) --KQ
This is a perfect example of an article that (1) people will love to fight about, (2) people will want to be biased, but (3) we can make unbiased. The article as it stands is clearly biased in favor of the view that Mumia is innocent (or guilt is unproven). For shame. --Larry_Sanger