Talk:Kutha meat: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:56, 5 November 2011

Sikhism NA‑class

Sikhism portal
This redirect is part of WikiProject Sikhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Sikhism. Please participate by editing the article, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
Guidelines: Manual of Style - Naming conventionsSikhismWikipedia:WikiProject SikhismTemplate:WikiProject SikhismSikhism articles
NA This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Archive 1
What was the pressing need to Archive just yet
Sikh-history
Please see Help:Archiving a talk page :It States

“ The talk page guidelines suggest archiving when the talk page exceeds 50 KB or has more than 10 main topics. However, when to archive, and what may be the optimal length for a talk page, are subjective decisions that should be adapted to each case. For example, ongoing discussions and nearby sections they reference should generally be kept intact ”

Also See Talk_page_guidelines#When_to_condense_pages :It States
When to condense pages

“ Large talk pages become difficult to read and strain the limits of older browsers. Also loading time becomes an issue for slow internet connections. It is helpful to archive or refactor a page either when it exceeds 50 KB, or has more than 10 main sections.
Archive—do not delete: When a talk page has become too large or a particular subject is not discussed any more, do not delete the content—archive it. See Help:Archiving a talk page for details on why and how to. Summarize ("refactor"): See Wikipedia:Refactoring talk pages for details on why and how to refactor talk pages.
”

But there were only 2 Main topics and not 10 when you Archived , and the page smaller than 50KB when you archived

Lets take a look

17 March 2011 Sikh-history Talk page looked like this .

4 October 2011 Sikh-history (Archiving)

18 October 2011 Intothefire (No pressing need to archive as yet
18 October 2011 Sikh-history,
Sikh-History's edit summary states : The discussion's are redundant, I'm adding a link to this archive. Please do not undelete archives again.
But the discussions are not redundant , the number of topics are not 10 but 2 and the page is not too large for difficulty in navigation or uploading .

Its largely only a discussion between you and me , I am not keen to archive as yet then why are you so keen to Archive just yet ,lets follow the Wiki guidelines on Archiving
please undo this Archive .
.Intothefire (talk) 02:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pleas see WP:LAWYER. Thanks SH 09:56, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 Its  largely only a discussion between you and me , I am not keen to archive as yet  then why are you so keen to Archive just yet ,lets follow the Wiki guidelines on Archiving<br>
 please undo this Archive .<br> .[[User:Intothefire|Intothefire]] ([[User talk:Intothefire|talk]]) 02:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
+::Pleas see [[WP:LAWYER]]. Thanks [[User:Sikh-history|<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue;font-size:16px">S</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:goldenrod;font-size:16px">H</em>]] 09:56, 5 November 2011 (UTC)