User talk:WikiLeon

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #11

Speak on it!

Home   Talk   Wikipedians   Userboxes   Ribbons   Awards   Guide   Tasks

User:Lbmixpro/talkheader

Thanks for the info

For more details on this topic, see User talk:71.131.182.135#Blocked!.

Haha I guess I did get a little heated in my remarks to those other users, and I can see now how you might have thought that I was simply a malicious user. Thanks for the information about what not to delete etc. Not quite sure how causing a ruckus on a site not directly related to the encyclopedia would constitute disruption, but it's your call and I'm fine with that. Is it alright if I take down the warning about removing vandalism warnings and your comment, since I've read them both? —This unsigned comment was added by 71.131.182.135 (talk • contribs) .

Problem with Rory096

Rory096 keeps reverting my page and reinstating Malagurski "warnings" and new as well. Can you tell him to stop? Croatian historian ( ) 15:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

It's true, I'm a dirty vandal. Even look at the history of WP:AIV, where I was reported twice. And my block log, where I was blocked twice! --Rory096 15:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

You're vandalizing by deleting the warnings. You've been repeatedly warned to stop deleting them. Try listening. See WP:VANDAL and WP:TALK for the appropriate policy,. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 15:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Shut up. Read the page. Lbmixpro and others have apologized for misinterpreting policy. I have the right to remove anything I want from my talk page, and especially trolling like that of Boris Malagurski. Croatian historian ( ) 15:34, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Croatian historian, Please try to be civil, please? Since I'm so involved in this dispute, I'm leaving it to another admin to look into this. --LBMixPro^{<Speak|on|it!>} 20:35, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Ahem, "misinterpreting policy?" WP:VAND is very clear about this. Lbmixpro: Sorry for having to have this spill over onto your talk. --Rory096 15:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Rory: Talk to User:Mel Ettis about this. He found out the vandalism warnings were false, but I predict a major change in policy when it comes to removing warnings. --LBMixPro^{<Speak|on|it!>} 20:35, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Apparently you don't understand policy. How about WP:NPA ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 15:35, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Apparently YOU dont understand policy. Croatian historian ( ) 15:34, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

I apologize as well Lbmixpro. Croatian Historian: your talk page was blocked by the admins. You think we don't understand policy? Go ahead and read WP:VANDAL....or if you like I'll show you the exact section that states deleting your warnings is vandalism. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 15:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Deleting trolling is not vandalism and has always been accepted at wikipedia. On the contrary, adding vandalism and trolling on a talk page may lead to you being blocked. Croatian historian ( ) 15:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Boris' comment

I feel I should comment on the issue. I would like to start by writing a Croatian historian quote:

• "Not all nationalism is genocidal or aggressive expansionist/irredentist like the Serbian one." [1]

I'm a Serb. I find that very offensive. So, I posted a "no personal attacks" template on his page. He just deleted it. He claims that I'm mad at him because he voted against me when I applied for an administrator on English Wikipedia, but that is not the reason at all. We're all a little biased, some more than others. But this next quote by Croatian historian is too much:

• "Alojzije Cardinal Stepinac was perhaps the most honourable man in history of Croatia of the 20th century, also if compared to great statesmen like Franjo Tuđman." [2]

Doesn't that seem a little too biased. I would even dare to call it nationalist. This is an encyclopaedia, not a blog. I'd also like to mention some other edits he made to actual articles, which I find are extremely biased, and quite frankly should be considered as vandalism:

• "Serb irredentism and attempt to create a Greater Serbia under Serb leader Slobodan Milosevic led to the Yugoslav wars...", *"Serb war criminal Slobodan Milošević in the Hague...", *<<just erased a bunch of text>>, *<<here as well>>

And that's just what I could find in a few minutes... Not to mention, he's very rude: [3]. Also, here's what he wrote about User:Lbmixpro - "vandalize user pages, needs to be banned", and the same for User:Rory096; "vandalize user pages (restoring personal attacks/trolling, deleting content), needs to be banned" for User:OrbitOne and "adminship abuse, removing properly placed warning templates" for User:Pgk.

Enough said. I don't know if he is blocked at the moment, some users keep unblocking him, maybe they think he might change his ways. Not likely. Block him for good - he is a vandal. --Boris Malagurski ₪ 04:27, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/SPUI

Has been started. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Blocking policy

For more details on this topic, see User talk:PizzaMargherita#Re: Blocking policy.

Shouldn't users like this be blocked for more than one day? They have brought nothing good to WP... PizzaMargherita 08:20, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

I know it's shared, but my point is, look at the contributions: vandalism, vandalism, vandalism, vandalism, vandalism, vandalism, vandalism, vandalism, vandalism. That's it. They're wasting a lot of our time. PizzaMargherita 10:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

The history of that account spans far more than 24 hours. Not one worthwhile contribution. And I'm not saying block forever either, but I would consider one month or two to be more appropriate, so they find another hobby in the meantime. If somebody with good intentions comes around and cannot edit, well, it's not the end of WP is it? And the statistics are pretty clear, that's very unlikely to happen.

Also, is it the right way to answer on my page? What's the point of splitting a discussion? Thanks. PizzaMargherita 19:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

srry about that

i'm sorry :( 66.169.1.14 04:04, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

WP:RFC/SPUI

Further information: User talk:Rschen7754 § Re: SPUI's RfC.

As a fellow admin, could you please give me some advice on what happened there at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/SPUI? Things sure went sourh. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Ok b/c it gets worse by the hour... --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

You sure you endorsed the right summary? Because your edits seem to conflict... --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:43, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

==Personal Attack==

Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thank you.